Calculating Angle Between E-Field and Current Vectors in Anisotropic Mat.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angle between the current density vector ##\vec j## and the electric field vector ##\vec E## in an anisotropic conductive material, defined by the equation ##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)##. The angle ##\phi## can be derived using the formula ##\phi = \arccos\left(\frac{\sigma_0|\vec E|^2 + \sigma_1 \cos(\alpha) |\vec E|^2}{|\vec E||\vec j|}\right)##. Additionally, for the coordinate transformation where ##\vec n = \vec e_3##, the conductivity tensor takes the form ##\sigma = \begin{pmatrix}\sigma_0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma_0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \sigma_0 + \sigma_1\end{pmatrix}##, leading to the conclusion that ##\gamma = \frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_0 + \sigma_1}## and ##\bar\sigma = \sigma_0##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of anisotropic materials and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and dot products
  • Knowledge of conductivity tensors and their representations
  • Experience with coordinate transformations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angles between vectors in anisotropic materials
  • Learn about conductivity tensors and their applications in material science
  • Explore coordinate transformations and their implications in physics
  • Investigate the physical significance of the parameters ##\sigma_0## and ##\sigma_1## in conductive materials
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, electrical engineers, and students studying anisotropic conductive materials and their electrical properties.

Karl Karlsson
Messages
104
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
In a certain anisotropic conductive material, the relationship between the current density ##\vec j## and
the electric field ##\vec E## is given by: ##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)## where ##\vec n## is a constant unit vector.

i) Calculate the angle between the vectors ##\vec j## and ##\vec E## if the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec n## is α

ii) Now assume that ##\vec n=\vec e_3## and define a coordinate transformation ξ = x, η = y, ζ = γz where γ is a constant. For what value of γ does the conductivity tensor component take the form ##\sigma_{ab} = \bar \sigmaδ_{ab}## and what is the value of the constant ##\bar\sigma## in the new coordinate system?
Relevant Equations
##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)##
ξ = x, η = y, ζ = γz
In a certain anisotropic conductive material, the relationship between the current density ##\vec j## and
the electric field ##\vec E## is given by: ##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)## where ##\vec n## is a constant unit vector.

i) Calculate the angle between the vectors ##\vec j## and ##\vec E## if the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec n## is α

ii) Now assume that ##\vec n=\vec e_3## and define a coordinate transformation ξ = x, η = y, ζ = γz where γ is a constant. For what value of γ does the conductivity tensor component take the form ##\sigma_{ab} = \bar \sigmaδ_{ab}## and what is the value of the constant ##\bar\sigma## in the new coordinate system?My attempt:

I don't really know if I get it into the simplest possible form but i guess one way of solving i) would be:

##\vec E\cdot\vec j = |\vec E|\cdot|\vec j|\cdot cos(\phi)= \sigma_0\vec E^{2} + \sigma_1\vec n\cdot \vec E(\vec n\cdot\vec E) \implies \phi =arccos(\frac {\sigma_0|\vec E^{2}| + \sigma_1\cdot cos(α)\cdot|\vec E|\cdot cos(α)|\cdot|\vec E|} {|\vec E|\cdot|\vec j|})##

Is this the best way to solve this?

On ii) i am completely lost. What do the coordinate transformations mean? x, y and z are not even in the given expression ##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)##. I have already found a matrix ##\sigma## that transforms ##\vec E## to ##\vec j##. Do they want me to find eigenvectors and eigenvalues? Why?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your result for part i). For part ii), since you already found the conductivity tensor, you can tell immediately by inspection that the tensor is diagonal with ##\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy}=\sigma_0=\sigma## and ##\sigma_{zz}=\sigma_0 + \sigma_1##. By making the coordinate transformation you are asked to solve,
$$
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma_0 + \sigma_1 \\
\end {pmatrix}
\begin {pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \gamma \\
\end {pmatrix}
=
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$
 
Fred Wright said:
I agree with your result for part i). For part ii), since you already found the conductivity tensor, you can tell immediately by inspection that the tensor is diagonal with ##\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy}=\sigma_0=\sigma## and ##\sigma_{zz}=\sigma_0 + \sigma_1##. By making the coordinate transformation you are asked to solve,
$$
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma_0 + \sigma_1 \\
\end {pmatrix}
\begin {pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \gamma \\
\end {pmatrix}
=
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$

Hi Fred!
Are you sure one can't express the answer in i) in any other or simpler way because it feels like my answer for the expression of the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec j##Ok! Then I might understand but I would really appreciate verification by someone or comment on what is not correct.

Since ##\vec n## is just ##\vec e_3## i get $$\sigma = \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_0&0&0\\0&\sigma_0&0\\0&0&\sigma_0+1\end{bmatrix}$$.$$\vec E_3(\sigma_0+1)=\sigma_0\cdot\vec E_\zeta$$. I write ##\vec E_\zeta = \gamma\cdot\vec E_3## because of the change of basis matrix
$$\begin {pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \gamma \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$
and therefore ##\gamma=1+1/\sigma_0## and ##\bar\sigma = \sigma_0##. Is this correct?
 
Karl Karlsson said:
Are you sure one can't express the answer in i) in any other or simpler way because it feels like my answer for the expression of the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec j##
You can simplify your expression by substituting an expression for ##|j|##. I suggest,
$$
j\cdot j=(\sigma_0 \vec E + \sigma_1 \hat n (\hat n \cdot \vec E)\cdot (\sigma_0 \vec E + \sigma_1 \hat n (\hat n \cdot \vec E))=(\sigma_0|\vec E | + \sigma_1 (\hat n \cdot \vec E ))^2
$$
$$
|j|=\sigma_0|\vec E | + \sigma_1 (\hat n \cdot \vec E )
$$
Karl Karlsson said:
Ok! Then I might understand but I would really appreciate verification by someone or comment on what is not correct.

Since ##\vec n## is just ##\vec e_3## i get $$\sigma = \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_0&0&0\\0&\sigma_0&0\\0&0&\sigma_0+1\end{bmatrix}$$.
This is wrong. It should be,
$$
\sigma = \begin {pmatrix}
\sigma_0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma_0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma_0 +\sigma_1 \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$
and therefore ##\gamma = \frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_0 + \sigma_1}##.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K