Engineering Calculating angular acceleration

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating angular acceleration using gravitational force and moment equations. The user calculates the gravitational force and moment but is confused about the resulting angular acceleration, which does not match their expected value. Other participants suggest providing a sketch for clarity and inquire about the coordinate system and the meaning of the symbols used. They also point out the unconventional units being used and emphasize the importance of consistency in unit application. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer communication of the problem setup and consistent unit usage to resolve the calculation issue.
shreddinglicks
Messages
225
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
In Creo I have a pendulum modeled that is swinging. I want to calculate by hand the initial angular acceleration. Creo gives this value as 97.68 r/s^2.

Using Creo I know:

m = 5.26e-1 kg
A = 1.19e4 mm^2
distance from origin to centroid (0,-6.8e1,0)
g = 9806.6 mm/s^2

Centroid moment of inertia (Principal moment of inertia)
Ix' = 1.13e3
Iy' = 8.41e1
Relevant Equations
alpha = M / J angular acceleration
M = F*r where F is the gravity force

Parallel axis theorem
J = (Ix' + Iy') + [A*(dx^2 + dy^2)]
I calculate the gravity force

F = mg = (-9806.6)*(5.26e-1) = -5158 (mm^2*kg)/s^2

I get the moment

M = F*r = (-3.5e5)*(-6.81e1) = 3.5e5 (mm^2 * kg) / s^2 Where r is the y coordinate distance from origin to centroid

J = (Ix' + Iy') + [A*(dx^2 + dy^2)] = ([1.13e3] + [8.41e1]) + ([1.19e4]*([-6.81e1]^2)) = 5.52e7 kg*mm^2

alpha = M/J = 3.5e5 / 5.52e7 = 6.34e-3 1/s^2

What did I do wrong? I'm not getting my desired 97.68 r/s^2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, a sketch of the situation might help ...
There you could also indicate what coordinate system and the meaning of some of the symbols you use (instead of leaving us to guess). Is the rotation around one axis ? Then why the ##I_x## and ##I_y## ?

You use a funny set of units, but -- if you do it consistently -- that should be ok. Do you ?
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K