Calculating Angular Speed After Spoke Shortening in Rotating System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the new angular speed of a rotating system when the length of spokes is shortened from an initial speed of 2.0 rev/s. Participants initially misunderstand the relationship between spoke length and angular speed, mistakenly suggesting a direct multiplication. However, the key concept is the conservation of angular momentum, not energy, which is crucial for determining the new angular speed. As the spokes shorten, the rotational inertia decreases, leading to an increase in angular speed. The final conclusion emphasizes that angular momentum conservation is the principle to apply in this scenario.
mandy9008
Messages
127
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The system of small objects shown in the figure below is rotating at an angular speed of 2.0 rev/s. The objects are connected by light, flexible spokes that can be lengthened or shortened. What is the new angular speed if the spokes are shortened to 0.10 m? (An effect similar to that illustrated in this problem occurred in the early stages of the formation of our Galaxy. As the massive cloud of dust and gas that was the source of the stars and planets contracted, an initially small angular speed increased with time.)

p8-47.gif



The Attempt at a Solution


I would think that you would just multiply 2.0 rev/s by the new length, 0.10m, which will give 0.20 rev/s. When I enter this, it tells me that my answer is off by a multiple of ten.
 

Attachments

  • p8-47.gif
    p8-47.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: What's conserved as the spokes are shortened? How does shortening the spokes affect the rotational inertia?
 
energy is conserved. sometimes it helps me when i know the answer to get to it, so i looked in the back of my textbook for a similar question. In this question, the spokes were shortened to 0.5m and the final answer was 8 rev/s. could you help me this way?
 
mandy9008 said:
energy is conserved.
Actually, energy is not conserved. (It takes energy to pull in those spokes.) But something else is.
 
angular momentum is conserved?
 
mandy9008 said:
angular momentum is conserved?
Yes. That's what they are looking for. (The problem is not very clearly stated.)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top