Calculating Arc Length on a Circle with Cartesian Coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the arc length from the positive x-axis to a point on a circle defined by Cartesian coordinates (0.40, 0.30). Participants clarify that the radius can be determined using the distance formula, and the relationship between radius and circumference is highlighted, noting that circumference equals 2πr. The formula for arc length is discussed, emphasizing that it can be calculated using the formula arc length = theta * radius, where theta is the angle in radians. The conversation reveals some confusion about the concepts of radius, diameter, and arc length, but ultimately points towards a straightforward solution. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Kikki:)
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Carteian coordinates of a point on a circle with its center at the origin are [0.40, 0.30]. What is the arc length measured counterclockwise on the circle from the positive x-axis to this point?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Wouldn't they be the complete opposite as in negative cordinates. Since going counter clockwise is - and clock wise is + . I ues the main question I'm asking is what does it mean with the coordinates, does it mean that 0.4 left and 0.3 up? But then what would the radius be? I guess I need a little help getting started otherwise I can do the rest I think on my own. :] You all have helped me so much! I'm not great at torque and rotational motion. More better at the concepts, I'm hrrible at algebra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It says that the center is at the origin, point (0,0), and a point on the circle is (.40,.30). Isn't there some way that you could find the radius from that? Once you have that, is there some sort of "relationship" between the radius of a circle and it's diameter?

Wouldn't they be the complete opposite as in negative cordinates. Since going counter clockwise is - and clock wise is + .

You are still measuring a distance (of the arc), are you not?
 
QuarkCharmer said:
It says that the center is at the origin, point (0,0), and a point on the circle is (.40,.30). Isn't there some way that you could find the radius from that? Once you have that, is there some sort of "relationship" between the radius of a circle and it's diameter?

So if its positioned at (0,0) then that would mean that the radius is 4 and the 8. Yes there is because radius is half of the diameter.

So this is basically an easy question but I'm just making it hard.
 
I meant circumference, not diameter! Sorry about that.

Isn't there some relationship between the radius and the circumference? (think about what a radian is)

The radius is going to be the value given by the distance formula between the given points right?
 
QuarkCharmer said:
I meant circumference, not diameter! Sorry about that.

Isn't there some relationship between the radius and the circumference? (think about what a radian is)

The radius is going to be the value given by the distance formula between the given points right?

Yes because 2\pir and that is also to find the radian. You take the radius and use that to go around the make up of the circle which is usualy 6.28 with just a circle. So the formula for radian = arc length/radius .
 
Using the formula, arc-length = theta*radius, can't you figure out the arc length?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top