Calculating Area Density of Steel Discs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of two steel disks with a uniform thickness and an area density of 10 grams/cm². The initial calculations for the mass of each disk were attempted using the formula for density, but the total mass was incorrectly stated. The correct approach involves multiplying the area of each disk by its area density, leading to a total mass of 250π grams for the larger disk and 40π grams for the smaller disk. Clarification was provided regarding the problem statement, emphasizing the need to confirm the question being answered. Ultimately, the correct total mass is determined to be 58π grams after resolving the calculations.
bpinto
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In general, the density of a three dimensional object is expressed as mass per unit volume. However where an object is of uniform thickness its depth can be combined with the density factor allowing the density to be expressed in terms of mass per unit area. A pair of steel disks joined together are of uniform thickness and each has an area density of 10 grams/cm2


Homework Equations



ρ = m/A


The Attempt at a Solution



Mass of bigger disc
10 = m/25∏

Mass of smaller disc
10 = m/4∏

Total mass = 290∏

I don't have any idea what I am doing wrong as the answer is suppose to be 58∏
 

Attachments

  • Q82.jpg
    Q82.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 538
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculation of the mass seems to be correct. Is your problem statement complete?
 
Sorry it is incomplete I thought it was part of the attachment, the actual question asks:

What is the mass of the whole object?
 
I agree. Your calculation for the total mass looks right but was that the question?

You wrote...

Mass of bigger disc
10 = m/25∏

That's correct but to me it's a slightly a strange way to do it. I would write:

Mass = area * area density

= 25∏ * 10
= 250∏
 
Looks like it was supposed to be 2g/cm2
 
thanks for the help guys
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top