Calculating Average Kinetic Energy of a Running Boy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the average kinetic energy of a 60 kg boy running up a slope in 5 seconds. Participants express confusion about determining average kinetic energy without knowing the boy's speed. It is clarified that average kinetic energy relates to average velocity, which can be derived from the distance traveled, calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. The average speed is found to be 1 m/s, leading to a kinetic energy calculation of 30 Joules. The problem is noted as potentially ill-posed due to its assumptions about constant speed.
lingling
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A boy of 60 kgtakes 5 s to run up the slope in the diagram. (Please refer to the attachment) What is his average kinetic energy?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know the meaning of 'average' kinetic energy. Is this mean kinetic energy per unit time (per second)? How can I calculate it without knowing the velocity of the boy?
 

Attachments

  • 掃瞄0002.jpg
    掃瞄0002.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 610
Physics news on Phys.org
His average kinetic energy is the energy corresponding to his average speed
 
How can I know the kinetic energy of the boy without knowing the speed?
My stupid thought was that to use the increase in gravitational potential energy of the boy but I can't get the answer. Why?
 
KE=1/2mv^2

average kintetic energy would come from his average velocity. notice how the distance he went is expressed as a right triangle

WARNING: ANSWER BELOW
try not to look at the answer if you can solve it yourself. i made it white so you must high light it and not see it 'on accident'





[pythagorean theorum tells us the distance he ran was 5 meters and we're given he ran it in 5 seconds, so average velocity is 1 m/s. 1^2 is still 1, and m is 60 so divide it by two and you get 30 N]
 
lingling said:
How can I know the kinetic energy of the boy without knowing the speed?
Assume that he runs up at a constant speed. (Since KE is proportional to speed squared, I think this is an ill-posed problem.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top