Calculating Beam Deflection: Questions & Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter mchei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Deflection
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating beam deflection, specifically the application of the method of superposition and the proper placement of the variable "x" on the beam. Superposition is applicable when simplifying complex linear problems into manageable parts, but it is not always necessary, especially when using methods like integration. Participants emphasize starting "x" at the left-hand end of the beam and ending at the right-hand end for clarity. There is a debate about the validity of creating equivalent loading configurations, with some arguing that they may not truly be equivalent. The conversation highlights the importance of specificity in questions to yield more effective answers.
mchei
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have some questions about calculating the deflection of beam.
First, when should I applied the method of superposition ?
Second, When I'm setting a "x" on the beam, where should I start and end ?

Thank you for answering!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
1. Whenever it is necessary.
2. Start at the beginning and go to the end.

Your questions are overly vague, as are my answers. If you have a specific example to discuss, then you will get more usable responses.
 
qjcbG.png


for question like above, is superposition necessary?
 
Last edited:
It's not necessary to use superposition. If you had a table of beam deflections and slopes for a cantilever loaded from A to B with a UDL and from A to C with a UDL, you could use superposition to find the slope and deflection for the problem shown. If you are going to work out the slope and deflection using, say, the integration method, superposition would not be as useful.
 
mchei: In response to your two questions in post 1 ...
(1) Superposition is used when a more difficult linear problem can be broken into two (or more) simpler problems.

(2) I usually like to start x at the beam left-hand end, and end x at the right-hand end.​
Superposition might be necessary in a question such as in post 3.
 
@ NVM

Couldn't you create an equivalent loading configuration to make the math easier and not have to deal with superposition at all?
 
aeb2335: No, I currently think an "equivalent" loading is generally not equivalent.
 
Back
Top