Calculating Beta Factor: Frame of Reference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter STAii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beta
AI Thread Summary
In discussions about the beta factor in relativity, the choice of frame of reference is crucial for accurate calculations. It's essential to select a consistent frame, such as the lab frame or center-of-momentum frame, and perform all calculations within that context. When comparing two frames, one stationary and the other moving at 0.8c, confusion arises regarding the perceived speeds of an object accelerating to 0.9c. An observer in the stationary frame calculates an impossible speed of 1.7c, while the moving observer perceives the object's speed as 0.8c. The resolution lies in applying Lorentz transformations correctly to convert speeds between frames, ensuring that the speed of light remains constant across all inertial frames. This highlights the importance of using the correct mathematical framework to avoid contradictions in relativistic scenarios.
STAii
Messages
327
Reaction score
1
In relativity, when it comes to calculating the beta factor, what frame of reference are we supposed to use to measure the speed of the object ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whichever you want, as long as you're consistent.

Typically you start by picking a useful frame of reference - the lab frame, or the center-of-momentum frame, for example - and do all your calculations in that. If you want to switch to another frame, you have to Lorentz transform everything (or better yet, just use invariants!).
 
Umm ...
So suppose i was comparing what i see in two frames of reference.
Let's asuume that the first frame of reference is not moving.
The second frame of reference is moving at 0.8c (with the direction of the body in subject) comparing to the frist frame of reference.
Now our body is moving at 0.8c comparing to the first frame of reference.
An observer in the first frame of reference thinks that the object can only speed up for the amount of 0.2c (cause otherwise the object will reach the speed of light).
While the observer in the second frame of reference thinks that the object can still speed up with the amount of 1c.
Let's suppose that the object actually speeded up for 0.9c, the observer in the first frame of reference will see that the object is moving in the speed of 1.7c which is impossible, while the observer in the second frame of reference will see the object moving at 0.8c which is possible !

So which one of them is right ? (or where did i go wrong ?)
 
Originally posted by STAii

where did i go wrong ?)
Let's suppose that the object actually speeded up for 0.9c,
Just there? :smile: .'c's the same in all inertial frames. Then you'd have to use the Lorentz transformations to work out it's new speed in a different reference frame.
 
Last edited:
Ah ...
Right, i got it now.
Thanks.
 
Back
Top