Calculating Bullet Trajectory for Science Project

  • Thread starter Thread starter sirasher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating bullet trajectory for a science project, focusing on determining which caliber travels the farthest. The project assumes all bullets are fired horizontally from a height of 9.8 meters and hit the ground in one second. However, the time of flight is incorrectly calculated; the bullet would only drop half that height in one second. To accurately determine horizontal distance, the horizontal speed must be considered as a non-linear function influenced by drag, which varies with velocity. Ultimately, the distance traveled is primarily dependent on the muzzle velocity of each bullet, with drag coefficients being relatively similar across calibers.
sirasher
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am doing a science project and need a few questions answered. I am trying to theoretically determine which caliber of bullet is capable of traveling the farthest. I've already assumed that the time each caliber of bullet spends in the air is going to be exactly the same. Therefore, I'm assuming each bullet is shot perfectly horizontally at an altitude of 9.8 m, so each bullet hits the ground in 1 second. To determine the distance each bullet travels, I need the velocity. I'm aware of theexit velocities of each caliber of bullet. But while some bullets may exit the barrel faster than others, drag slows each one down at different rates. I was wondering if anyone could get me an equation that I could use to determine the deceleration due to drag for each caliber of bullet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you're building in an extra lot of work trying to work out the drag on the bullets, you can calculate the trajectories just using the muzzell velocity and the angle from the ground the bullet is fired. The difference between rifle calibers is so small compared to the differences in initial velocity. Just neglect to mention air resistance.

If you really want to calculate the drag i think you can do it by taking the cross sectional area of the bullet and you'll also need a constant to account for the different shapes of the bullets, finally you'll need to find a drag coefficient for air. All this sounds like a real mission to get, maybe someone else thinks of a simpler solution. Also with something like a bullet you'll get into all kinds of complicated rubbish with turbulent flow and shock waves if your bullets are supersonic.
 
sirasher said:
I am doing a science project and need a few questions answered. I am trying to theoretically determine which caliber of bullet is capable of traveling the farthest. I've already assumed that the time each caliber of bullet spends in the air is going to be exactly the same. Therefore, I'm assuming each bullet is shot perfectly horizontally at an altitude of 9.8 m, so each bullet hits the ground in 1 second. To determine the distance each bullet travels, I need the velocity. I'm aware of theexit velocities of each caliber of bullet. But while some bullets may exit the barrel faster than others, drag slows each one down at different rates. I was wondering if anyone could get me an equation that I could use to determine the deceleration due to drag for each caliber of bullet.
Your time of flight of 1 sec. is incorrect. If you fire at a height of 9.8m, the bullet will drop only half that height in one second (h = \frac{1}{2}gt^2).

In order to determine the actual horizontal distance traveled before hitting the ground, you would need to know the horizontal speed as a function of time or distance. The problem is that this is not linear. Drag deceleration is a function of the square of the bullet velocity.

I think you can assume that the drag coefficients of all the bullets are about the same. The distance ultimately depends on the muzzle velocity of each bullet.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top