Calculating Buoyancy to Find a Polar Bear's Mass

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of a polar bear partially in water and on ice, one must consider the buoyancy forces acting on both the bear and the ice slab. The amount of the bear submerged in water affects how much water is displaced, which in turn influences the ice's buoyancy. The discussion highlights the need for specific measurements, such as the extent to which the ice sinks and the specific gravity of the ice, to arrive at an accurate calculation. The bear's specific gravity is noted to be 1.0, indicating it is the same as water. Without additional data, a precise answer cannot be determined.
thegreatone
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Buoyancy ... HELP NEEDED

A polar bear is partially in water and partially on a slab of ice. The ice sinks to some extent. Calculate the bear's mass.

How can this be done?

I know it comes down to forces but how . . .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not forces - it will come down to how much of the bear is in the water and how much is out of the water. However much is out of the water will directly add to the mass of the ice slab, causing it to sink lower, displacing that much more water.

Of course, you can't answer this question without more information (unless you are merely providing an algebraic answer.)
 
70% is out of the water
voume of the ice is 10m^3
bear's specific gravity is 1.0
 
someone please help ... please
 
help anyone :confused:
 
You still haven't given us enough information: the ice sinks "to some extent". How much?
The bear's specific gravity is exactly the same as water? What is the specific gravity of the ice?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top