Calculating Capacitance of Misaligned Plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of misaligned finite parallel plate capacitors. It suggests that rotating the top plate to align it with the bottom plate could yield a similar electric field distribution. The approach implies that the capacitance can be approximated by treating the plates as parallel despite initial misalignment. This method may simplify the calculations while maintaining accuracy in the electric field representation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of alignment in determining capacitance in practical scenarios.
Sawoah
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Calculating the Capacitance of "out of alignment" finite parallel plate capacitors

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


What if you rotated the top plate about its centre so that both plates then lie parallel? This should be allowable since almost equal electric field is created as swallowed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top