Calculating Charge Flow in Capacitor: 1.02V to 6.78V Battery Swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter BuBbLeS01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
AI Thread Summary
An uncharged capacitor initially connected to a 1.02 V battery accumulates 1.69 μC of charge on its positive plate. When the battery is replaced with a 6.78 V battery, the charge on the capacitor must increase to maintain its capacitance. Using the relationship between charge and voltage, the additional charge can be calculated by setting up a ratio based on the initial charge and voltage. The calculation shows that the total charge at 6.78 V is 1.12x10^-8 C, leading to an additional charge of 9.54x10^-9 C. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between charge, voltage, and capacitance in capacitors.
BuBbLeS01
Messages
602
Reaction score
0
Capacitors...Please HELP!

Homework Statement


An uncharged capacitor is connected to the terminals of a 1.02 V battery, and 1.69 μC flows to the positive plate. The 1.02 V battery is then disconnected and replaced with 6.78 V battery, with the positive and negative terminals connected in the same manner as before. How much additional charge flows to the positive plate?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not really sure how to start this problem without having the capacitance. Can someone help me get started..thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can I set these up as ratios?
 
Capacitance is just charge/voltage. You could set up two ratios equal (capacitance isn't changing with additional voltage, but as voltage increases you must increase charge to hold the capacitance constant.
 
So I could do...
1.69x10^-9 C/1.02 V = Q/6.78 V
Q = 1.12x10^-8 C
Then subtract them to get my answer being...
9.54x10^-9 C
 
No that's not right...ahh what am doing wrong??
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top