Calculating Confidence: Solving a MIT Probability Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter birderfox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mit Probability
birderfox
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Problem:

We have two coins: one is fair and the other coin is a coin that produces heads with probability 3/4. One of the two coins is picked and this coin is tossed n times. Explain how to calculate the number of tosses to make us 95% confident which coin was chosen. You do not have to calculate the minimum value of n, though we would be pleased if you did.

So this problem is a practice problem for a test. I have been trying to solve it for a few hours now and I am kind of stuck. We have been studying random variables, expectation and distributions. Any of you guys have any idea of how to approach this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
birderfox said:
Problem:

We have two coins: one is fair and the other coin is a coin that produces heads with probability 3/4. One of the two coins is picked and this coin is tossed n times. Explain how to calculate the number of tosses to make us 95% confident which coin was chosen. You do not have to calculate the minimum value of n, though we would be pleased if you did.

So this problem is a practice problem for a test. I have been trying to solve it for a few hours now and I am kind of stuck. We have been studying random variables, expectation and distributions. Any of you guys have any idea of how to approach this?

Thanks

Use the test for comparing two proportions.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top