Calculating Delivery Time for Nuclides A & B

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
shamone
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
In a reactor and sepertation plant complex, nuclide A is produced in pure form, without any contamination by nuclide B.

A has a half life of 23minutes and B has a half life of 23days. A is a beta only emitter whereas B is a beta and gamma emitter. If A has been purified in a reatcor and 11.5minutes of purification it emmits 1000gamma rays per second and when delivered it also emits 1000gamma rays per seconf, how long did the delivery take?

Secondly if this was delivered to you by a courier company would you use them again?

I have used n(t) =No*lambday/(lambay-lambdax) * (e-lambdax*t - e-lambday8t)

So guessing this is something about activity, but can't quite get it. think the answer is 40.7days but not sure how to come to this************************************************************************

How does this affect the problem... the 11.5minutes.

A is a beta only emitter whereas B is a beta and gamma emitter. If A has been purified in a reatcor and 11.5minutes of purification it emmits 1000gamma rays per second and when delivered it also emits 1000gamma rays per seconf, how long did the delivery take?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your statements are a little confusing. If the activity is 1000Bq, then delivered, and it's still 1000Bq, then statistically no time has passed for the delivery. Can you restate the problem in its entirety?
 
That is the problem in it's entirity...
 
Anyone have any ideas?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top