Calculating Delta T for a Resistor - Philip's Guide

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the change in temperature (Delta T) for a resistor, additional information is needed, specifically the resistivity of the material or the potential gradient producing the current density. Without this data, it's impossible to determine the Ohmic power loss, which is essential for calculating temperature change. The discussion highlights that the provided parameters alone—specific heat, density, current density, and time—are insufficient for solving the problem. Philip acknowledges that his professor likely omitted the necessary resistivity information from the problem statement. Accurate calculations depend on having all relevant variables included.
philipc
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Lets say I'm given a 'specific heat, density, currenty density J, and the time that J exist, how can if find the the change in Temperature? My main problem is I don't know how to start the problem, a couple pointer in the right direction would be great.
Thanks
Philip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philipc said:
Lets say I'm given a 'specific heat, density, currenty density J, and the time that J exist, how can if find the the change in Temperature? My main problem is I don't know how to start the problem, a couple pointer in the right direction would be great.
Thanks
Philip

I don't think you have enough information here to solve this. You need at least one more info, either the potential gradient that is producing that current density, or the resistivity of the material (these two values are related). This is because, for the SAME current density, materials with different resistivity will produce different Ohmic power loss - this is what needs to be used to find the change in temperature.

Zz.
 
Zz,
thanks for your quick response
I just read the question again and I guess my professor forgot to put resistivity into the problem, but the final answer does include it.
Philip
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top