Calculating Density of NaCl Crystal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deathfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystal Density
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the density of crystalline NaCl with a face-centered cubic lattice and a dimension of a = 5.64 Å, one must first determine the total number of atoms in the unit cell, which is 4. This is derived from the contributions of corner and face-centered atoms, specifically 8(1/8) for corners and 6(1/2) for faces. The next step involves calculating the mass of NaCl in the unit cell using moles and Avogadro's number, followed by determining the volume based on the lattice parameter. Finally, the density can be computed by dividing the total mass by the volume of the unit cell. This method provides a systematic approach to finding the density of NaCl crystals.
Deathfish
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the density of crystalline NaCl, given that NaCl has a face-centred cubic lattice with a dimension a = 5.64A.

Homework Equations



1/8 Cl ion at each corner, 1/2 Cl ion on each face. 1 whole Na in the center, 1/4 Na ion along each edge.

The Attempt at a Solution



ok where do i begin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your question full?
For a FCC structure: corner atoms contribute only 1/8 and face-centered atoms contribute 1/6. So for a FCC system total number of atoms = 8(1/8) + 6(1/2) =4.
But which is corner atom and which is face-centered atom ?
Only idea comes to my mind is:
you should take 'a' as distance between two nearby Cl or Na atom. Then find the kg of NaCl single unit using 'mole' and 'Avogadro' stuff. Also you know volume. So you can compute density.
Hope this help
 
Last edited:
Given - "1/8 Cl ion at each corner, 1/2 Cl ion on each face. 1 whole Na in the center, 1/4 Na ion along each edge." - how would one determine the total atomic mass in the unit cell?

Then given the mass, how would one determined the density?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top