Calculating Distance with Non-Uniform Acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle moving along a straight line with an initial velocity of 5 m/s that begins to decelerate according to a non-linear acceleration formula. The goal is to determine the distance traveled before the particle stops.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss integrating the acceleration expression and question the necessity of multiple integrations. There are suggestions to solve the differential equation for velocity as a function of time and to consider distance as an independent variable. Some participants express confusion about the constants of integration and how to apply initial conditions.

Discussion Status

Several approaches to the problem have been proposed, including integrating once versus twice, and using different variables for integration. Participants are exploring various methods to handle the differential equation and the implications of initial conditions. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but multiple lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of initial conditions, specifically that the particle starts at the origin with a velocity of 5 m/s. There is also mention of the need to clarify the relationship between velocity and distance in the context of the problem.

SammyD97
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Capture.PNG

Homework Statement


A particle is moving along a straight line such that when it is at the origin it has a velocity of 5m/s. If it begins to decelerate at a rate of a=(-2.5v^(1/2)) m/s^2, where v is in m/s, determine the distance it travels before it stops

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I integrated the above expression twice with respect to time, to get an expression of s=(2(v^(5/3) t^2))/3+C1+C2. Where C1 ns C2 are constants. I've ended up with more variables than I have the know how to handle. I don't know what to do with the initial velocity. I thought of integrating with respect to v but it didn't make sense. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should show your work.

How did you wind up with two constants of integration without one being multiplied by something else?

You know that when x = 0, v = 5 m/s. Did you apply these initial conditions to determine what the constants of integration must be?
 
Your integral is incorrect.
It stops when v = 0, right?
Graphically, I get an answer of less than 3m.

I would attack it like this:
since acceleration is the derivative of velocity and ##a = -2.5 v^{1/2}##
assume that velocity is of the form ##v(t) = c(t+a)^2##
Then ##v' = 2c(t+a) = -2.5 \sqrt{ c (t+a)^2 } ##.
Using initial information, you should be able to find a suitable solution for c and a, then solve your velocity equation for the time when v = 0.
Last, integrate velocity from 0 to t_final to get total change in position.
 
Thanks guys. will try it and see what I end up with.
 
What's wrong with solving the differential equation

$$\frac{dv}{dt}=-2.5v^{\frac{1}{2}}$$

for v as a function of t, subject to the initial condition?

Chet
 
SammyD97 said:
I integrated the above expression twice ...
Why twice, you only need to integrate dv once to end up with v, and you're solving for v = 0.

I missed that the question was about distance traveled, not time, so you will need to integrate twice.

Chestermiller said:
What's wrong with solving the differential equation
$$\frac{dv}{dt}=-2.5v^{\frac{1}{2}}$$

So that would be

$$\frac{dv}{v^{\frac{1}{2}}} = -2.5 \ dt$$
 
Last edited:
rcgldr said:
Why twice, you only need to integrate dv once to end up with v, and you're solving for v = 0.
So that would be

$$\frac{dv}{-2.5v^{\frac{1}{2}}} = dt$$
I would have had the -2.5 associated with the dt.
 
rcgldr said:
Why twice, you only need to integrate dv once to end up with v, and you're solving for v = 0.
So that would be

$$\frac{dv}{v^{\frac{1}{2}}} = -2.5 \ dt$$
I thought I needed to s end up with an expression for position / distance
 
SammyD97 said:
I thought I needed to s end up with an expression for position / distance
You're correct. I lost a update to my prior post; and it's fixed now. So yes, you can start with dv/(v^(1/2) = -2.5 dt, and noting that v = ds/dt, this results in some function f(ds/dt) + 5 = t. (5 being the constant of integration, in this case the initial velocity). Again you can separate the equation so ds and the s terms are on one side and dt and the t terms are on the other and integrate again.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
You can use the distance traveled as independent variable instead of t. dv/dt=(dv/ds)(dv/dt)(ds/dt)=0.5 d(v2)/ds.You need to integrate with respect to s.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
ehild said:
You can use the distance traveled as independent variable instead of t. dv/dt=(dv/ds)(dv/dt)=0.5 d(v2)/ds.You need to integrate with respect to s.
If using chain rule, shouldn't that be dv/dt = (dv/ds)(ds/dt) = v dv/ds ?
 
  • #12
rcgldr said:
If using chain rule, shouldn't that be dv/dt = (dv/ds)(ds/dt) = v dv/ds ?

Yes, it was a typo, but the last formula is true. a=dv/dt= 0.5d(v2)/ds.
 
  • #13
ehild said:
Yes, it was a typo, but the last formula is true. a=dv/dt= 0.5d(v2)/ds.
OK, but is it any simpler than just continuing with the chain rule result:

$$v \ \frac{dv}{ds} = -2.5 v^{\frac{1}{2}}$$

$$v^{\frac{1}{2}} \ dv = -2.5 \ ds $$

Which only requires a single integration, while the previously mentioned equation

$$\frac{dv}{v^{\frac{1}{2}}} = -2.5 \ dt$$

requires two integrations.

As for the constant(s) of integration, the problem states that v = 5 m/s at t = 0 and s = 0, and that the initial position is s = 0, which allows you to solve for the constant(s) of integration with either approach. I got the same result for s using both methods.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Ok it took long for me to get back to this thread but I did get it eventually.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
  • #15
If anyone is curious the distance is

$$\frac{4}{3} \ \sqrt{5} \approx 2.981424 $$
 
Last edited:
  • #16
rcgldr said:
If anyone is curious the distance is

$$\frac{4}{3} \ \sqrt{5} \approx 2.981424 $$
Yep.

Thanks everyone for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K