Calculating e/m Ratio: A Puzzling Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter barcelonaboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the e/m ratio from an electron beam experiment, where the user has plotted Voltage against Current and obtained a gradient of 0.848. The formula for e/m is given as e/m = (4.49*10^8 * gradient^2) / volts, with volts set at 3000. However, the calculated value of 107625 is significantly lower than the expected book value of 1.7*10^11 Ckg^-1, leading to confusion about unit conversions. Participants suggest checking the units to ensure they are in SI format and clarify the relationship between the variables plotted. The user expresses uncertainty about how to reconcile the gradient's units with the required e/m units.
barcelonaboy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to calculate the ratio of e/m, I've plotted the given data points to get a straight line graph with a gradient of 0.848.

I know that the ratio of e/m is given by e/m = (4.49*10^8 * gradient^2)/volts
where volts = 3000.

When I plug the numbers in I get a value of 107625 which is nowhere near the given book value of e/m 1.7*10^11 Ckg^-1

I think that I'm doing something in the wrong units as I need to get the answer in C/kg^-1, but I can't see where I'm going wrong.

Any pointers owuld be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid that I don't know what you might be doing wrong because I don't know what data varibles you have. Are you plotting a current against a radius of a circle, or velocity against current flow, or voltage against current even I think can be one setup for an electron beam experiment.

Have you checked that your units are in the SI format?

Is your set of axis the right way round?

Yeah could do with some more info bud :(
Haths
 
Hi Haths,

I'm plotting a graph of Voltage (V) against Current (mA) (V/mA) as part of an electron beam experiment, which is giving a gradient of 0.848 with the R^2 coming out as 0.9991 which is a good fit for the data points, so I'm confident in the graph and the data points.

The equation that I need to plug my numbers into is, this includes the 4.49*10^8 as a dimensionless constant

e/m = (4.49*10^8)(gradient^2)(1/ 3000 volts)

I think that I'm going wrong on the units in the gradient as I can't see how to get from an equation that has units in volts and mA to one that involves Coulombs/kg or if there is some conversion factor that I'm not aware of.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top