Calculating eigenvectors of complex numbers

boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the eigenvectors of the matrix A


Homework Equations





3. The attempt at the solution

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 & -5 \\1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\]

First I find the characteristic equation A - \lambda I

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4-\lambda & -5 \\1 & 0-\lambda \end{array} \right)\]

and solve

\lambda^2-4\lambda+5=0

which gives the complex eigenvalues 2-i,2+i

we need to solve

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4-(2-i) & -5 \\1 & 0-(2-i) \end{array} \right)\] X = 0

and

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4-(2+i) & -5 \\1 & 0-(2+i) \end{array} \right)\] X = 0

for the first one I get to

<br /> (2-i)x - 5y = 0 <br />
<br /> x - 2-iy = 0<br />

I start to get lost after here any help grately appreciated
regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So far it looks fine.
Now you have two equations in two unknowns, so you can try to solve them. You will find that they are linearly dependent, so you will only get an expression of the form x = a y.
An eigenvector is then (1, a); the eigenspace is the span of this vector, namely { (x, ax) | x any real number }.
 
So from the 2 equations I get.

(2-i)x = 5y
and
x = (2-i)y

so is the first eigen vector

\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\ 2-i \end{array} \right)\] ?



for the second
(2+i)x - 5y = 0
x - (2+)iy = 0

I get

(2+i)x = 5y
and
x = (2+i)y

so is the second eigen vector

\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\ 2+i \end{array} \right)\] ?



regards
Brendan
 
There's an easy way to check your answer... multiply your supposed eigenvectors with the matrix, and check that you get the eigenvector times the corresponding eigenvalue back :)

(Didn't check your calculation, but the result looks good, though)
 
I multiplied the matrix and the first vector
\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 &amp; -5 \\1 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)\]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\2-i \end{array} \right)\]

and got

\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}-6+5i \\1 \end{array} \right)\]


than Imultiplied the eigenvalue by the associated eigenvector

\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}2-i \end{array} \right)\]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\2-i \end{array} \right)\]


and got

\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}2+i \\5 \end{array} \right)\]


So not sure what's going on
 
I have had a look at the solution given and this is the way that was shown.

from

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 &amp; -5 \\1 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)\]


you try and diagonalise the matrix.


So

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 &amp; -5 \\1 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)\]


becomes

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}0 &amp; 0 \\1 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)\]


and you solve for zero with the eigen values obtained earlier to produce the eigenvectors using

\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 &amp; 0-\lambda \end{array} \right)\]

so solve

x-(2-i)y=0

you do the same with the other eigenvalue 2+i

I don't know how they came to the following eigen vector did they just pick the numbers or was there a particular reason. They gave the eigenvector as

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 \\ 2-i\end{array} \right)\]
and
\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 \\ 2+i\end{array} \right)\]

I suppose there are infinite solutions but maybe because of the -5 above?

They use the vectors and call this the transition matrix

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 &amp; 5 \\2-i &amp; 2+i \end{array} \right)\]

Next they take the inverse of the transition matrix

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}\frac{1}{10}-\frac{1}{5}\times 1 &amp; \frac{1}{2}\times i \\\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{5}\times 1 &amp; -\frac{1}{2}\times i \end{array} \right)\]

and multiply that by the original matrix then the transition matrix.

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 &amp; -5 \\1 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)\]

and

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 &amp; 5 \\2-i &amp; 2+i \end{array} \right)\]


which gives the diagonalised matrix

\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}2+i &amp; 0 \\0 &amp; 2-i \end{array} \right)\]


which proves that they are the right eigenvectors.

Can someone please let me know why the chose those particular eigienvectros ?
As I could not simulate the last with those vectors.

regards
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top