Calculating Electric Field in a Charged Tube Using Gauss's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field within a hollow charged tube using Gauss's Law. The user initially attempts to apply Gauss's Law but questions the validity of their approach, particularly regarding the closed nature of the tube. Clarification reveals that the tube is hollow, leading to confusion about whether Gauss's Law is applicable. Participants emphasize the importance of the tube's geometry in applying Gauss's Law correctly. The conversation highlights the need for a proper understanding of the conditions under which Gauss's Law can be used effectively.
yevi
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
A long tube charge with charged with uniform spatial density \rho.
The inner radius of the tube is: a
The outer radius of the tube is: b

Need to find the electric field in: a<r<b

My approach is Gauss:

E*S=4 \pi kq

The S is the Gaussean Surface it should be 2 \pi r^2 ??

and q should be \rho*(r^2-a^2)??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer should be:
E=2 \pi k\rho\frac{r^2-a^2}{r}\hat{r}

So I did something wrong...
 
yevi said:
The answer should be:
E=2 \pi k\rho\frac{r^2-a^2}{r}\hat{r}

So I did something wrong...

Is the tube closed? because if it isn't then Gauss law can't be used.
 
what do you mean closed?
The tube is hollow...

If I can't use gauss, what should i use?
 
I still don't understand why I can't use gauss here.
 
Anyone? :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top