Calculating Electric Force on -3.29µC Charge at y=0.493m

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric force on a -3.29µC charge at y=0.493m, the electric field was determined using the formula E = (1/4πEo)*(q/r^2), yielding -1.22E-5 N/C. The force was then calculated using F = qE, resulting in -0.401 N. However, the problem lacks information about the charge exerting the electric field, which is essential for accurate calculations. It's crucial to verify unit consistency, ensuring electric field units are in N/C and the electric constant is correctly used as 8.99E9 Nm^2/C^2. Overall, the calculations seem correct, but missing context and unit checks may lead to discrepancies.
Lannie
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am having some trouble with the following problem:

Calculate the electric force on a -3.29microC charge placed on the y-axis at y=0.493m.

First I calculated the electric field at y=0.493m using the equation

E= (1/4piEo)*(q/r^2)

and found the electric field at that point to be -1.22E-5.
Then to find the electric force, I used F=qE and found F to equal -0.401 N. But for some reason this doesn't work out to be the right answer. If anyone could tell me where I've gone wrong, it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lannie said:
Hi, I am having some trouble with the following problem:

Calculate the electric force on a -3.29microC charge placed on the y-axis at y=0.493m.

If that's the complete statement of the problem, you should be having some trouble with it! :eek:

You need some information about whatever it is that is exerting an electric force on the charge in question.

First I calculated the electric field at y=0.493m using the equation

E= (1/4piEo)*(q/r^2)

That would be useful if you wanted to find the force that your given charge exerts on some other charge located 0.493m away (for example located at the origin). But even there you'd have to know how big that other charge is.
 


Your calculations seem to be correct. The only thing I would double check is the units. The electric field is usually measured in N/C and the charge is in C, so the force should be in N, not N/C. Make sure to double check your units and see if that helps. Also, make sure you are using the correct value for the electric constant, which is 8.99E9 Nm^2/C^2. Other than that, your calculations and approach seem to be correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top