Calculating Electromagnetic Field Energy Flux in Linear Medium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the divergence of the energy flux vector, represented as S = E × H, in a linear medium characterized by permittivity (ε) and permeability (μ). The user derives the expression for ∇·S and seeks clarification on whether their result is correct and if further simplifications are possible. They are advised to apply known relationships involving the time derivatives of the electric and magnetic fields to obtain the power per unit volume. Additionally, the conversation touches on the next steps involving the application of Gauss's Divergence theorem in relation to Maxwell's Equations. The user also inquires about the constancy of ε and μ, noting that they are generally not constants but assuming a simplified case for this problem.
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
Consider the electromagnetic field in a linear medium with material properties \epsilon \ \ \text{and} \ \ \mu. Calculate \nabla \cdot \mathbf{S} for the energy flux \mathbf{S = E \times H}.

My work:

\nabla \cdot \mathbf{S} = \nabla \cdot \frac{1}{\mu}(\mathbf{E \times B })

= \frac{1}{\mu}[ \nabla \cdot(\mathbf{E \times B })]

= \frac{1}{\mu}[\mathbf{B} \cdot(\nabla \times \mathbf{E} }) - \mathbf{E} \cdot(\nabla \times \mathbf{B} }) ]

= \frac{1}{\mu}[\mathbf{B} \cdot(-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{ \partial t}) - \mathbf{E} \cdot(\mu\epsilon\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{ \partial t})]

I guess my question is: is this the result? I have no idea what this problem wants. Are there at least any more immediately obvious simplifications?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost there. Remember E . dE/dt = 1/2 d/dt |E|^2 and B . dB/dt = 1/2 d/dt |B|^2 (sorry I don't know Latex). Use these results in your last equation, and not surprisingly you should get the expression for the power per unit volume of the electric and magnetic fields.
 
That's the classic result for Del*S. A next step (in another assignment) would be derivation of the total flux of S through a closed surface enclosing charges and currents. That would utilize Gauss's Divergence theorem with your present result and other Maxwell's Equations.

\int\limits_{Surf}^{} \vec{S} * \vec{n} dA = \int\limits_{Vol}^{} \nabla*\vec{S} dV

~
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all your help!
 
Are epsilon and mu constants??In the general case,they aren't,but i assume the problem asked for the simplest of them all.

Daniel.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top