Calculating Energy Ratio (Ef/Ei) for Earth's System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy ratio (Ef/Ei) for a system on Earth with specific velocities and height. The equations for total energy (E) include kinetic (K) and potential (U) energy components. Participants highlight the importance of correctly identifying initial and final conditions, noting that the final velocity is in cm/s while the initial is in m/s, which requires unit consistency. There is confusion regarding the height and the assumption of upward force, as the initial velocity is greater than the final. The key takeaway is the necessity of accurately calculating Ef and Ei before dividing to find the energy ratio.
jbgibson
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What is the energy ratio (Ef/Ei) of a system on Earth that has a final velocity of 3901.5 cm/s, initial velocity of 249.9 m/s, and a height of 0.006 km.


E = K + U
= 1/2mv^2 + mgh

Ef = 1/2mvf^2 + mghf
Ei = 1/2mvi^2 + mghi


It appears that the object is being forced upwards since the vi>vf. I tried several times setting hi = 0 and hf = 6m, but I can't seem to come up with the correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do want the energy ratio... did you find Ef and Ei and then divide? Also -- I notice here that vf seems to have units of cm/s... is that right and did you take that into account?... might just be these bookkeeping things.
 
physics girl phd said:
You do want the energy ratio... did you find Ef and Ei and then divide? Also -- I notice here that vf seems to have units of cm/s... is that right and did you take that into account?... might just be these bookkeeping things.

Yes, I'm trying to solve the energy ratio. I did take into account that vf has units of cm/s. Under normal circumstances, hf = 0, and vf>vi. I made the assumption, based on the values given, that hi = 0, and that an upward force is being applied.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top