Calculating Equations: Double Checking My Work | Calculus Word Problem Solution

[Jabus]

Okay, the following is just me trying to confirm if I did the problem correctly. It seems like I made a mistake somewhere, but the answer does sort of fit. So I suppose I'm just look for a check to see if I did this correctly. The equations I got from the world problem are top right, I then move into the problem on the left side and finish on the right. :D

Homework Statement

http://www.jabussucks.com/calcquestion.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution

http://www.jabussucks.com/calcanswer.jpg

 

[HallsofIvy]

At one point you have

P= 2x+ 3\left(\frac{1200}{x}

which is correct. The next line is

= 2x+ \frac{3600}{3x}[/itex]

<br /> which is wrong: to multiply a fraction by 3, you multiply the numerator, not both numerator and denominator!<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> = 2x+ 3600*3x^-1 </div> </div> </blockquote> Again wrong: you divide by the 3. But since that 3 is wrong to begin with, you&#039;ve just made it worse. What you should have is P= 2x+ 3600 x^-1.<br /> <br /> Next you have <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> = x+ 5400x^-1 </div> </div> </blockquote>that &quot;5400&quot; is your 10800 divided by 2. Apparently you have divided through by 2. But you have to divide both sides of the equation by 2. This would be P/2, not P. Anyway, it&#039;s best to leave it as P= 2x+ 3600x^-1 and differentiate that.<br /> Next, you have<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> = x+ \frac{1}{5400} </div> </div> </blockquote>No, the &quot;-1&quot; exponent applies only to x, not the &quot;5400&quot;. There is, in any case, no point in moving the 1/x up to x^-1 only to put it back in the denominator. Go ahead and differentiate P= 2x+ 3600x^-1.<br /> <br /> Unfortunately, having got the incorrect fraction, you add the fractions to get<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> P= \frac{5400x^2+1}{5400x} </div> </div> </blockquote>which is incorrect. I only mention it because you then have<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> P&amp;#039;= \frac{10800x}{5400} </div> </div> </blockquote> No, no, no! The derivative of \frac{f}{g} is NOT \frac{f&amp;#039;}{g&amp;#039;}!<br /> As if that weren&#039;t bad enough, from<br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> \frac{10800x}{5400}= 0 </div> </div> </blockquote>you go to <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> 10800x= 5400 </div> </div> </blockquote>and solve that to get x= 1/2. No! 5400*0= 0 not 5400!<br /> <br /> Better is to take P= 2x+ 3600x^-1 and differentiate it directly. <br /> P&#039;= 2- 3600x^-2= 0. Then x²= 1800. Solve that for x.

 

[Jabus]

Thanks for the reply HallsofIvy, I just wanted to check in on something. All of your corrections make sense, and clearly my brain isn't functioning today because those are all mostly things I should have caught myself doing.

But here's what happens when I try to go forward with P' = 2 - 3600x^-2

http://www.jabussucks.com/calcfollowup.jpg

So from there sub 0 for the P'. At which poin I can move the -3600x^-2 over to the left which gives me 3600x^-2 = 2

To isolate x do I not divide by 3600 both sides and then take the -2root of the right side? Perhaps, I'm just looking at everything wrong, I'm not sure what it is that's throwing me off.

I know If I go with your equation above:
x^2= 1800
then x = 42.4 but I'm hoping to find out what I'm doing wrong that I can't even get to that point.

 

[cristo]

You are at that point! When you work out your value for x it will be 42.4! But, to do it the way that HoI did (and to keep things as fractions, which is always more a more exact way of calculating things) you have the line

x^{-2}=\frac{2}{3600}

Note that \frac{2}{3600}=\frac{1}{1800}. Now, take the reciprocal of both sides, and you will obtain x²=1800.

A quick comment about your notation in the penultimate line: The right hand side would generally be written as (5.56 \times 10^{-4})^{-1/2}

 

[HallsofIvy]

Just seconding what cristo said: you have 3600x^-2- 2= 0 so
3600x^-2= 2 or x^-2= 2/3600= 1/1800. That means that x²= 1800= (2)9(100). x= \pmsqrt{2}(3)(10)= \pm30\sqrt{2}. That's approximately 42.4. (Since x is a distance, it must be positive.)