Calculating Equations of Ellipses Within a Cone

  • Thread starter Thread starter cpman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone ellipses
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around designing an equatorial platform mount for telescopes, focusing on the use of ellipses for bearings instead of circles. The creator believes that using ellipses, which can be perpendicular to the upper plate, will enhance strength and simplify construction. They reference a cone equation and express uncertainty about slicing the cone to derive the ellipse equations correctly. A question arises regarding the use of non-orthogonal bearings, with a suggestion that traditional designs typically employ orthogonal bearings for stability. The creator seeks guidance on accurately calculating the cuts for the ellipses.
cpman
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
Hello.
So, I'm designing an equatorial platform mount for my telescope at the moment. I'm also going to use it for another telescope that I'm in the process of building.

I know that for both of the bearings, I can use small sections of two circles cut from a cone with an angle between the axis and slant of my latitude. However, these would be at a 60 degree angle to the upper plate here, which I feel may weaken it. However, if I use ellipses, both bearings can be perpendicular to the upper plate, which should be stronger and easier to build. These ellipses would have to be perpendicular to the slant of the cone for this to be true.

I know that a cone where the axis is at 30 degrees to the slant should have an equation of 3(x^2 + y^2) = (\sqrt3 - z)^2. I know very little about 3D geometry, so I'm not entirely sure of this. This is what I got from Wolfram Alpha. Because I'm at 30 degrees north, presumably if I slice this cone with a plane with normal vector <0, -1, \sqrt3>, this will result in an ellipse perpendicular to the slant of the cone. (Again, I'm not entirely sure on this.)

I tried just setting the plane -y + \sqrt3 z + 1 = 0 equal to the cone to find the intersection, but I got an equation that isn't an ellipse. Is this the proper way to go about calculating the equations of these ellipses, or should I do something else?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello I do not have an answer for you, rather a question : why do you use non-orthogonal bearings ? An EQ platform is usually made with those, the tilt only being the angle between the whole assembly and the horizontal (it's really just an alt-az mechanism installed at an angle) so your setup is unusual.
 
I want to use orthogonal bearings to both simplify construction and to make the finished platform stronger. This is the same principle used in what are called vertical north section platforms. There are quite a few designs like this. I'm just not sure how exactly I should calculate the cuts for the ellipses.
 
Ah sorry I'm not familiar with those designs, can't help here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top