Calculating flux with a magnet and a coil

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating magnetic flux in a physics project involving a magnet falling through a PVC tube with a coil wrapped around it. The coil is connected to a voltage probe that records data in LoggerPro, which is used to derive the flux.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the induced voltage and the flux, referencing the formula U = -N • dΦ/dt. There is uncertainty about how to interpret the derivative and how to calculate the flux from the data provided by LoggerPro.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on interpreting the data from LoggerPro and suggested methods for calculating the flux using integration. There is an ongoing exploration of how to visualize or compute the area under the curve from the voltage data.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that LoggerPro provides U(t) as a function of time, but there is confusion regarding how to graph this data to obtain the flux. The discussion includes considerations about the time intervals between measurements and how to approximate the area under the curve.

AnneClara
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
Hey, I'm having some difficulties with my physics project and I hoped someone could help me out. We have to calculate the magnetic field, but first we need to know the flux.

This is the setup we got:
We have to let a magnet fall through a PVC tube. The tube has a coil around it (it covers just a small part of the tube) which is connected to a voltage probe. The voltage probe is connected to a laptop with LoggerPro.

Then we have to calculate the flux ( Φ ) with the results we got in LoggerPro.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I already know that I have to use the formula U = -N • d Φ / dt
(d, not Δ!)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I do know how many windings the coil has (N) and LoggerPro shows the time (t) and the induction voltage (U). The flux has to be calculated with a diagram.
But I don't really know how to do this due to the 'd' in the formula. I've been told that I have to do something with the derivative and the surface in the diagram, but I'm not sure how to do this.

Does anyone have an idea how to do this?
Thanks in Advance!

Anne
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume that LoggerPro has given you U(t) as a function of time. Note that you can write dΦ/dt=(U(t)/N). (The minus sign is irrelevant here.) Then the total flux is Φ = ∫(dΦ/dt)dt = ∫(U(t)/N)dt. Got it?

Welcome to PF, AnneClara.
 
kuruman said:
I assume that LoggerPro has given you U(t) as a function of time. Note that you can write dΦ/dt=(U(t)/N). (The minus sign is irrelevant here.) Then the total flux is Φ = ∫(dΦ/dt)dt = ∫(U(t)/N)dt. Got it?

Thank you!
LoggerPro gives the U as a function of the t indeed. But I don't really know how to put this in a graph to get the flux.
 
You don't really need a graph to get the flux. Look at what ∫(U(t)/N)dt, which is equal to the flux, is saying you should do.
∫ means "add", add what? Answer: the ratio U(t)/N at a given time t (provided by LoggerPro in a table) multiplied by dt. OK, so what's dt? Answer: the constant time interval between measurements (also provided by LoggerPro). In other words, you want the area under the curve, not the curve itself. You approximate this area by the sum of areas of rectangles of height U(t)/N and width dt. If you don't know how to (or can't) do this directly in LoggerPro, I suggest that you export the file to spreadsheet format which you can then process as you please.
 
kuruman said:
You don't really need a graph to get the flux. Look at what ∫(U(t)/N)dt, which is equal to the flux, is saying you should do.
∫ means "add", add what? Answer: the ratio U(t)/N at a given time t (provided by LoggerPro in a table) multiplied by dt. OK, so what's dt? Answer: the constant time interval between measurements (also provided by LoggerPro). In other words, you want the area under the curve, not the curve itself. You approximate this area by the sum of areas of rectangles of height U(t)/N and width dt. If you don't know how to (or can't) do this directly in LoggerPro, I suggest that you export the file to spreadsheet format which you can then process as you please.

Thank you so much! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K