How Do You Calculate the Focal Length of a Planar Convex Lens?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the focal length of a planar convex lens, the relevant equation is 1/f = (n/n_M - 1)(1/r_1 + 1/r_2), where n is the lens material's refractive index (1.491), n_M is the refractive index of the medium (1), r_1 is the radius of curvature (50 cm), and r_2 is considered infinite for a planar surface. The focal length is determined by the distance from the lens's curved surface to the focal point, which is valid for rays close to the optical axis, known as paraxial rays. This assumption simplifies the calculations and ensures accuracy in using the formula. Proper sign conventions for r_1, r_2, and f must be applied for correct results. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurate focal length calculations in optics.
Icheb
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Light is falling on the planar side of a thin planar convex glass lens. The curvature radius |r| is 50cm. I have to calculate the distance of the focal point to the curved surface of the lens, which to my understanding is the focal length, since it's a thin lens. Additionally I am supposed to only look at rays that are close to the axis, and I'm not sure what exactly that means.

From my understanding the only equation I need is \frac{1}{f} = (\frac{n}{n_M} - 1) (\frac{1}{r_1} + \frac{1}{r_2}). n would be 1,491, n_M would be 1, r_1 would be 50cm and r_2 would be infinitely big (since the lens is planar convex).

Would that be sufficient to solve it? If so, what does it mean that I'm only supposed to look at rays that are close to the axis? What does that change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you study the derivation of the formula for ##\frac{1}{f}##, you'll see that the derivation assumes that the rays are close to the axis ("paraxial rays"). So, the formula is generally valid only for paraxial rays.

When using the formula, you need to be sure to use the sign conventions for ##r_1##, ##r_2##, and ##f## that are associated with the formula.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top