Calculating Force on a Torus: Lennard Jones Potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter llello
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Torus
llello
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
The problem is with calculating the force of a particle by another particle while both particles lie on a torus. By this I mean, if particle i and j are in a box (LxL) and particle i is on the left edge of the box and particle j is on the right edge of the box, the distance used in the force will be L - \left| x_i - x_j \right|.

I have 100 particles in a box where each particle obeys the Lennard Jones potential:

V(x) = 4(\frac{1}{r^{12}}-\frac{1}{r^6} )

So I put in

r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2} and use F_{ij}=-\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\hat x - \frac{\partial V}{\partial y} \hat y

and get

F_{ij} = (24(\frac{2}{r^{14}} - \frac{1}{r^{8}}))*[(x_i - x_j)\hat x + (y_i - y_j)\hat y ]

for the force of the jth particle on the ith particle. This is all well and good if we are not going to deal with the periodic boundary conditions. I'm not seeing how this would be modified to account for the torus. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, that was the TeX problem. Thanks :)

Also, it might be of interest to know that:

\left| r_{i,j} \right| = min( \left| x_i - x_j \right|, L - \left| x_i - x_j \right| )
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top