Sarial said:
I tried something else that I think is along the right lines from what my teacher was saying, but he wasn't going too in depth at the time:
My problem is 67.4 keV and a Nickel-61 nucleus
Knucleus + Egamma = 67.4 keV
pnucleus = -pgamma
pnucleus + pgamma = 0
mv + E/c = 0
Knucleus = (1/2)mnucleusv^2nucleus
(1/2)mnucleusv^2nucleus + Egamma = 67.4 keV
67.4 keV - (1/2)mnucleusv^2nucleus = Egamma
So then plug the above equation for Egamma into the momentum equation
mnucleusvnucleus + (67.4 keV - (1/2)mnucleusv^2nucleus)/c = 0
(931.5e6 eV x 61 amu)vnucleus + (67.4e3 eV/3e8 m/s)-((.5(931.5e6 eV x 61 amu)/(3e8 m/s))v^2nucleus
Then solve for the quadratic:
(5.68e10)vnucleus + 2.25e-4 - 94.7v^2nucleus
(-94.7)v^2nucleus + (5.68e10)vnucleus + 2.25e-4
This gives you 6.00e8 m/s, which isn't right... Any ideas?
I can't go through algebra with the values already inserted... it's too messy... but here is my treatment on the relationship between the recoil energy and the excitation energy. I think I've shown that the former is definitely exceeded by the latter, using the quadratic equation approach you mentioned. Enjoy.
By conservation of momentum,
P_{R} = P_{\gamma}
E_R = \dfrac{P_R^2}{2M}
E_\gamma = P_\gamma c
2ME_R = \dfrac{E^2_\gamma}{c^2}
By conservation of energy,
U = E_\gamma + E_R
Here $U$ is the excitation energy.
2ME_Rc^2 = (U - E_R)^2
2ME_Rc^2 = U^2 - 2UE_R + E_R^2
-\frac{1}{2}E_R^2 + E_R(Mc^2 + U) - \frac{1}{2}U^2 = 0
Having solution
E_R = (Mc^2 + U) \mp \sqrt{(Mc^2+U)^2 - U^2}
= U + Mc^2 \mp \sqrt{(Mc^2)^2 + 2Mc^2U}
Now, let's express all energy as a proportion of U.
\dfrac{E_R}{U} = 1 +\dfrac{Mc^2}{U} \mp \sqrt{\left [ \dfrac{(Mc^2)}{U} \right ]^2 +2 \dfrac{ Mc^2}{U} }
We know that Mc^2 \gg U, so set x \equiv \dfrac{Mc^2}{U}
\dfrac{E_R}{U} = 1 + \left [ x - \sqrt{x^2+2x} \right ]
For x very large, this is
= 1 + \left [ x - (1+\varepsilon) x\right ]
where 0<\varepsilon < \frac{1}{x}. Thus,
\dfrac{E_R}{U} = 1 - \varepsilon x < 1
so the recoil energy is less than the excitation energy.