I Calculating Headwind Component for Trigonometric Wind Triangle Problem

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cristiano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the headwind component in a trigonometric wind triangle problem, specifically seeking a general procedure or algorithm. The user provides examples with varying wind directions and ground tracks but struggles with consistent calculations. Suggestions include using vector components to simplify the process, allowing for the addition and subtraction of vectors without multiple cases. An addendum reveals that the user has found a formula for the angle between two vectors, but notes it is not efficient. The conversation emphasizes the need for a streamlined approach to determine the angle between wind and aircraft speed.
Cristiano
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
This is a question about the well known trigonometric problem of the wind triangle, but my problem is just the calculation of the head wind component.
I don't know how to write a general procedure to find the angle between the wind and the speed of the aircraft (the so called ground speed).

Suppose that the wind direction WD= 120° and the ground track GT= 40°; the wind direction is always *from* x degrees, then I need to consider WD + 180= 300; the angle is GT - 300 + 360= 100°.
Now suppose that WD= 40° and GT= 120°; the above formula doesn't work; in this case I just need to do (WD + 180) - GT.
Please, could someone help me in finding a general procedure to do that?
Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You don't need to do all this. Just draw a diagram and everything becomes obvious.
What angle are you trying to find out, anyway?
And what is ground track? The speed of the plane relative to the ground?
 
nasu said:
You don't need to do all this. Just draw a diagram and everything becomes obvious.

I already do that by hand, but the problem is that I need to find a general procedure or an algorithm (few lines of C code).
I need something like this:
1) calculate angle= (WD + 180) - GT
2) if angle > 360 then angle= angle - 180
3) if angle < 0 then angle ...
4) ...

but it's just an example.

nasu said:
What angle are you trying to find out, anyway?

The angle between the wind and the aircraft.

nasu said:
And what is ground track? The speed of the plane relative to the ground?

Yes.
 
Why don't you use components to add or subtract the vectors? Then you don't need to have different cases.
If you write the x component of vector a (for example) as ax=a cos(theta) where theta is the angle with the horizontal, ax will be negative when the angle is between 90 and 270 degrees. You add the x components and the y components and the signs will tell you in what quadrant is the angle of the resultant. And the inverse tangent will give you the value of the angle.
 
Probably I didn't get your point; let me try an example.
Suppose that we have the vector g (ground speed) = 450 and the vector w (wind) = 50.
The angle gt for g is 20° and the angle wt for w is 150°. The correct result is 150 - 20 = 130.
I do:
x= g * cos(gt) + w * cos(wt)
y= g * sin(gt) + w * sin(wt)
atan(y / x)= 25.2°.

== Addendum ==

In the meanwhile, I use the formula for the angle between two vectors:
gx= g * cos(gt), wx= w * cos(wt)
gy= g * sin(gt), wy= w * sin(wt)
cos(a)= (gx * wx + gy * wy) / g / w
which correctly returns 130°, but it's not very efficient.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top