Calculating Heat and Time for 150g Water and 50g Ice System at 0C to Reach 100C

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat and time required to raise the temperature of a system containing 150g of water, 50g of ice, and 20g of aluminum from 0°C to 100°C. The initial calculations for heat required (102170J) and time (511 seconds) were confirmed as correct. However, the approach to calculating the final temperature after adding more ice was critiqued, emphasizing the need to separate heat loss from different components rather than combining them improperly. The participant revised their calculations and arrived at a final temperature of 64.7°C, acknowledging the correct mass of water as 200g after the ice melts. The discussion also touched on whether density differences should be considered, ultimately concluding that they are likely negligible for this problem.
Dan Feerst
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I've never had to do one quite like this. Just wanted to check my work.

Homework Statement


150g of water and 50g of ice are in a container made from 20.0g of aluminum. The system consisting of the water, ice and the container are at thermal equilibrium at 0C. The container is wrapped in a thermal insulation that isolates it from the environment. A water warmer rated at 200 watts is placed in the container and switched on. The contents of the container are gently stirred to keep the temperature of the system uniform.

a. Determine the amount of heat(in joules) required to raise the temperature of this system to 100C (Lf=333J/g, Cw=4.186J/gK, CAl=0.900J/gK)

b. How long will it take the warmer to heat the mixture to 100C. Show Calculation

c. After the system has been heated to 100C, and additional 50.0g of ice at 0C are added. What is the final temperature of the mixture? Show work.


Homework Equations


Q=mCdT

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is what i did. Sorry I used d in place of lambda, and omitted degree symbols. not sure how to work this thing.

a.
mwCwdTw+miCwdTi+MAlCAldTAl+miLf
=> 100(4.186(50+150)+20*0.9)+50*333=Qs=102170J

b.
w=j/s =>
102170J=200t
t=511s

c.

I'm really unsure of this part. I tried to treat all three components of the original system as one.
msCsdTs=miCidTi+miLf
(20+150+50)(4.186+0.900)(300-3Tf)=45Tf+16650
595302=Tf(45+6119.52) =>Tf=97.6C

Well, am I at least close?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Parts (a) and (b) look OK.

For part (c), you need to say that the sum of all the heat losses or gains add up to zero. You may consider the 150 g of water at 100 oC as one entity, but you cannot add the specific heat of aluminum to the specific of water as you have done. You need to separate the expressions for the heat loss of the 150 g of water and of the aluminum.
 
It seems like that should be mathematically equivalent. I suppose I just don't completely follow.
If all of my Q values from the system are in equilibrium at 100C, I would think I could set it equal to the heat of the final cube to get the final temperature. If this is correct, I can't see why combining terms wouldn't work. If you don't mind could you calculate C and tell me what answer your get. perhaps your answer will give me a better idea of what I'm doing wrong.

Thanks


kuruman said:
Parts (a) and (b) look OK.

For part (c), you need to say that the sum of all the heat losses or gains add up to zero. You may consider the 150 g of water at 100 oC as one entity, but you cannot add the specific heat of aluminum to the specific of water as you have done. You need to separate the expressions for the heat loss of the 150 g of water and of the aluminum.
 
I will not calculate your answer but I will show what you are doing wrong.

You have 150 g of water and 20 g of Al going from 100 oC to equilibrium temperature Tf. The heat transferred out of these is

Q = 150*4.186*(100 - Tf) + 20*0.9*(100 - Tf)

You can pull out a common factor of (100 - Tf) to get

Q = (150*4.186 + 20*0.9)*(100 - Tf)

but there is no mathematically correct way to combine the left factor into something like

Q = (150 + 20)*(4.186 + 0.9)*(100 - Tf)

Also, that (300 - 3Tf) is completely nonsensical.

It is seems that your algebra skills need some improvement.
 
Alright, I admitted I didn't know what I was doing, you don't have to be a jerk about it.

anyway,
I tried it again, and I think I see where I screwed up, I skipped too many steps. This time I got an answer of 64.7C which makes a bit more sense.
question... well two actually.
I used 200g of water in the calculation not 150, since the first 50 grams of ice would be approximately 50g of water, is this correct?
Assuming that's correct, should I be correcting for the difference in densities?
I would think that is something the instructor would specifically ask for if he wanted it done.

kuruman said:
I will not calculate your answer but I will show what you are doing wrong.

You have 150 g of water and 20 g of Al going from 100 oC to equilibrium temperature Tf. The heat transferred out of these is

Q = 150*4.186*(100 - Tf) + 20*0.9*(100 - Tf)

You can pull out a common factor of (100 - Tf) to get

Q = (150*4.186 + 20*0.9)*(100 - Tf)

but there is no mathematically correct way to combine the left factor into something like

Q = (150 + 20)*(4.186 + 0.9)*(100 - Tf)

Also, that (300 - 3Tf) is completely nonsensical.

It is seems that your algebra skills need some improvement.
 
Dan Feerst said:
Alright, I admitted I didn't know what I was doing, you don't have to be a jerk about it.
If you are seeking help, it is wise and appropriate not to antagonize the people who might provide it, even if you think they are jerks.
anyway,
I tried it again, and I think I see where I screwed up, I skipped too many steps. This time I got an answer of 64.7C which makes a bit more sense.
question... well two actually.
I used 200g of water in the calculation not 150, since the first 50 grams of ice would be approximately 50g of water, is this correct?
Yes, my mistake, 200 g is the correct number.
Assuming that's correct, should I be correcting for the difference in densities?
I would think that is something the instructor would specifically ask for if he wanted it done.
What "correction for the difference in densities" are you thinking of?
 
kuruman said:
If you are seeking help, it is wise and appropriate not to antagonize the people who might provide it, even if you think they are jerks.

No, believe me, I do appreciate your help. but I would rather go elsewhere than deal with rude comments. If you feel that I should set your comments aside then maybe you shouldn't be making them in the first place

kuruman;2495025}What "correction for the difference in densities" are you thinking of?[/QUOTE said:
Never mind, I'm pretty sure the instructor will ignore the approximation. When the original 50g of ice becomes water, the density shifts from 0.9167g/cc to 0.9998g/cc @ 0C. If the mass stays the same , there is a volumetric difference of about 4.5 cm^3. Most likely negligible.
 
4.5 cm^3 is not negligible, but I don't understand why the density difference should be corrected for when density was never used in the solution. Look at the question:

"150g of water...50g of ice... 20.0g aluminum"

Where was either volume or density ever mentioned?
 
Back
Top