I Calculating Helicity in Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics using Pauli Matrices

Tio Barnabe
The helicity in non relativistic quantum mechanics is given by ##\sigma \cdot p / |p|## where ##\sigma## are the pauli matrices and ##p## the momentum. In spinor space, the ##\sigma## are 2x2 matrices, and thus, the helicity, if we calculate it, is a 2x2 quantity. But in 3d physical space, the above equation is an inner product between two three-vectors, because we have three pauli matrices. It's like ##\sigma_i p^i## and thus the helicity is a 1x1 quantity.

My question is, How can I transform the pauli matrices, such that each matrix ##\sigma_i## becomes a number, such that I get the latter result I mentioned above? Maybe taking their determinant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tio Barnabe said:
The helicity in non relativistic quantum mechanics is given by ##\sigma \cdot p / |p|## where ##\sigma## are the pauli matrices and ##p## the momentum. In spinor space, the ##\sigma## are 2x2 matrices, and thus, the helicity, if we calculate it, is a 2x2 quantity. But in 3d physical space, the above equation is an inner product between two three-vectors, because we have three pauli matrices. It's like ##\sigma_i p^i## and thus the helicity is a 1x1 quantity.

My question is, How can I transform the pauli matrices, such that each matrix ##\sigma_i## becomes a number, such that I get the latter result I mentioned above? Maybe taking their determinant?

The Pauli matrices and the corresponding helicity operator ##\sigma \cdot p / |p|## are operators, not scalars. The scalar helicities ##\pm\frac{1}{2}\hbar## are eigenstates of the helicity operator.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
mikeyork said:
The scalar helicities ##\pm\frac{1}{2}\hbar## are eigenstates of the helicity operator.
what if we have a general state with spin and momentum not aligned. In this case it will not be an eigenstate of the helicity operator.
 
Tio Barnabe said:
what if we have a general state with spin and momentum not aligned. In this case it will not be an eigenstate of the helicity operator.
That's right. It will be a superposition -- or a spin eigenstate along another axis.
 
  • Like
Likes Tio Barnabe
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top