Calculating if a Point is Inside/Outside a Triangle in 2D

  • Thread starter Thread starter debwaldy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a point lies inside or outside a triangle in 2D, one method involves using the cross product; if all three cross products point in the same direction, the point is inside. Another approach is to check the position of the point relative to each triangle side using line equations, ensuring the point and the opposite vertex share the same sign for all sides. Additionally, calculating the area of the triangle formed by the point and the triangle's vertices can also indicate the point's position; if the sum of the areas of the smaller triangles equals the area of the larger triangle, the point is inside. The area method suggests that if the point lies on a side, one of the smaller triangles will have an area of zero. These methods provide various ways to assess the point's location relative to the triangle.
debwaldy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi there,so I'm trying to write a vb.net program which will tell me whether a cartesian point in 2D lies inside or outside of a triangle.
I'm not looking for the code or anything, I'm merely wondering how one does this type of calculation manually?
could the cross product be used?if the results of all three cross products point in the same direction the point lies inside the triangle, otherwise it lies outside the triangle?i read this in a forum but i don't honestly understand the logic behind it?
or is there a much simpler way i have overlooked?
any advice would be much appreciated
debs:biggrin:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think the idea behind your approach is to consider a triangular prism.
http://www.math.washington.edu/~nichifor/Math402/prism_drawing.bmp

Given the points A,B,C of your triangle you have to set up three planes in order to get a triangular prism. Actually, you only need the normal vectors and define them to point "inwards".

Once you have those normal vectors n1, n2 and n3 you can determine
whether your point P, which you want to examine, lies within the prism and whether it lies within your triangle (x-y-plane with z=0).

I hope this is helpful.
 
How are you given each side of the triangle? If you are given the vertices of the triangle you can write the line between two points in the form ax+ by+ c= 0. If a point is on one side of that line, ax+ by+ c will be larger than 0, if on the other, less than 0.

For each line, check to see if the given point is on the same side as the third vertex. (check to see if ax+ by+ c has the same sign for both.)

If the given point is on the same side of the line given by each pair of vertices as the third vertex, the the point is inside the triangle.
 
thanks for the help.just with the 2nd method,you're saying all i need do is use y-y1 = m(x-x1) and use to of the vertices to calculate the slope in each case?
 
Yes. And then see if the given point and third vertex (neither of which are on that line) give the same sign when put into y- y1- m(x-x1) (which is 0 only for points on the line).

If so, then the given point and the third vertex are on the same side of that line. If it is true for all three sides of the triangle, then the given point is inside the triangle.
 
alternative?

thanks that's great stuff.i was thinking as well could an alternative method be to use the area of triangles.the previous procedure i had to write was calculating the area of the triangle given the three vertices.could i say that if the point p lies inside the triangle then it splits this up into three smaller triangles & the sum of these areas of the 3 small triangles must equal the area of the larger triangle if the point lies inside the large triangle.if the point p lies on one of the sides of the triangle then the area of one of the small triangles will = 0 and the area of the other two will = the area of the large triangle??if the point lies outside the triangle then the sum of the three "small" areas will larger than the area of the original triangle...??maybe line method is easier...:-p
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top