Calculating Image Distance Using a Christmas Tree Ball

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the image distance using a shiny Christmas tree ball, the diameter of the ball is 9.63 cm, and the object (face) is 7.81 cm away. The initial attempt at using magnification to find the image distance was incorrect, as magnification cannot be determined without the image distance. Instead, the mirror formula should be applied, which relates object distance and image distance through the focal length derived from the radius of curvature of the ball. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct formulas and understanding the properties of convex mirrors for accurate calculations. The correct approach involves finding the radius of curvature and applying the mirror equation to determine the image distance.
Jess_18033152
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You look at yourself in a shiny Christmas tree ball, which has a diameter of 9.63 cm. If your face is 7.81 cm away from the shiny ball, calculate the image distance.

Homework Equations


?
Thinking I would use
magnification = di/d0

di = 0.0781m
d0 = 0.0963m

The Attempt at a Solution


-0.811m

This doesn't sound right to me, is this perhaps because di is supposed to be what I'm trying to find out?

If so, would I then assume that the magnification is 0.0781 and I need to times that by 0.0963 to work out di? The the calculations would be as follows;?

m x do = di

di = 0.0781 x 0.0963
= 7.52 x 10^-3 m (3sf)

I think this would be the correct way to work out this question, I just wanted to double check that my second method is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think magnification formulae will help you here. You're given the object distance and a ball, which acts like a convex mirror. Have you tried using the mirror formula $$\frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f}$$ with the proper signs?

What answer is supplied with the book?
 
Jess_18033152 said:
This doesn't sound right to me, is this perhaps because di is supposed to be what I'm trying to find out?

That's right. You have dO, the distance from the object to the mirror, and you're asked to find dI, the image distance.

Jess_18033152 said:
If so, would I then assume that the magnification is 0.0781 and I need to times that by 0.0963 to work out di? The the calculations would be as follows;?

No, you don't immediately have the magnification because you don't have the image distance.

Look at the information provided to you. You have dO and the diameter of the mirror. For an optical surface we usually work with the radius of curvature ##R##, not the diameter. Find ##R## and see if you have any equations that you can use ##R## into get the image distance or another helpful property.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top