Calculating Improper Integral of x^3/(x^4-3)^1/2

AI Thread Summary
The improper integral of x^3/(x^4-3)^(1/2) from 1 to infinity is being evaluated, but the calculation leads to an undefined expression due to a negative value inside a square root. The limit as b approaches infinity results in one expression tending to infinity while the other becomes undefined, indicating divergence. The discussion suggests there may have been an algebra error in the process, but ultimately concludes that the integral is divergent and not meaningful outside complex analysis. The presence of a negative under the square root reinforces the conclusion of divergence. The integral's behavior highlights the challenges of evaluating improper integrals with complex components.
FancyNut
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I stopped at the last step while calculating this improper integral:

integral of x^3\ ( x^4 - 3)^1\2 with limits from 1 to infinity...

that's x cubed over the square root of x raised to 4 minus 3...



after replacing infinity with b and taking the limits it seems that I have to take limits of two expressions one that goes to infinity which is ( (b^4 - 3)^1\2) / 8 but the other is undefined since I have a negative 2 inside a square root. The second expression is the square root of negative two all over 8.


Thanks for any help XD
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to make sure, that's:
\int_1^{\infty} \frac{x^3}{\sqrt{x^4-3}} dx
Which is divergent.

Perhaps there was an algebra error leading up to this?
 
Not only is it divergent, but it makes no sense outside the field of complex analysis..
 
Yeah that's it.

I end up with two expressions and when taking the limit of the first it's infinity but the second has a negative inside the sqaure root. I guessed it's divergent since whatever mistake I did doesn't change (I think..) that the second expression is a constant anyway... I guess. :p

Thanks dudes. ^_^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top