Calculating Initial Velocity of a Falling Object: A Troubleshooting Guide

AI Thread Summary
A stone is dropped from a bridge 44 meters high, and another stone is thrown 1 second later, both hitting the water simultaneously. The initial calculations for the falling stone's time were correct, but confusion arose regarding the equations used to find the initial velocity of the second stone. Participants pointed out errors in the equations, emphasizing that the correct form should include time squared for acceleration. The discussion clarified that the initial velocity equation must be properly structured to ensure unit consistency. Ultimately, the correct approach was confirmed, leading to a resolution of the misunderstanding.
emyt
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a stone is dropped into th water fro a bridge 44 m above the water. another stone is thrown vertically 1.0s after the first is dropped. Both stones strike the water at the same time. What is the initial speed of the second stone?

Homework Equations



x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t)
vx = vxo + axt
x = x0 + 1/2(vx+vx0)(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



it seemed like a pretty simple question, I calculated how long it took for a stone to go from 44 m above the water to 0 m in free fall ( 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) ) then I subtracted 1 second from that time and plugged it into 0 = 44 + vx(8) - 4.9(8) to see the initial velocity of the second stone..

then something strange happened.. I tried to plot a speed v.s. time graph and so I wanted to find the velocity of the stone at a point in time.. so I plugged vx = -4.9(9) and I get some pretty big number.. -88.. then I tried plugging it into x = 1/2(-88)(9) and I get a humongous number.. what's going on?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, firstly your equation is wrong x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t). You see a.t will give you the unit of m/s however v.t gives you m which is distance so how can you add speed with distance? Secondly x0 is the initial displacement from a point a reference and x is your final displacement. Try again and i believe your approach is correct :biggrin:
 
semc said:
Hi, firstly your equation is wrong x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t). You see a.t will give you the unit of m/s however v.t gives you m which is distance so how can you add speed with distance? Secondly x0 is the initial displacement from a point a reference and x is your final displacement. Try again and i believe your approach is correct :biggrin:

I'm not sure :S, that equation should work shouldn't it? I've used it before.. Also, my x0 is 44 because I'm taking that as the initial distance and so my acceleration is negative because it will go from 44m to 0mthanks
 
emyt said:
I'm not sure :S, that equation should work shouldn't it? I've used it before.. Also, my x0 is 44 because I'm taking that as the initial distance and so my acceleration is negative because it will go from 44m to 0m

Yeap you are correct in the displacement part :-p however as i mentioned if you were to look at the equation you wrote, the units on the left and right won't add up do they? I believe the equation is x = x0 + vt + 0.5at^2
 
semc said:
Yeap you are correct in the displacement part :-p however as i mentioned if you were to look at the equation you wrote, the units on the left and right won't add up do they? I believe the equation is x = x0 + vt + 0.5at^2

the equation is x = x0 + vx0t (initial velocity) + 0.5at^2 and it should work, as it comes from x = x0 + 1/2(v + vx0 )t which is just the addition of distances..

thanks
 
can someone help please..
 
What seem to be your problem? 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) should be 0 = 44 - 4.9(t2)
 
semc said:
What seem to be your problem? 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) should be 0 = 44 - 4.9(t2)


AH right.. I forgot that it was at^2

thanks a lot!
 
Back
Top