Calculating Kinetic Energy Loss in Neutron Collision

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the fraction of kinetic energy lost during a head-on elastic collision between a neutron (mass = 1.01u) and a target particle at rest, specifically hydrogen (1.01u) and heavy hydrogen (2.01u). Participants emphasize the use of the Conservation of Momentum and the Work-Energy Theorem to derive relationships between the velocities of the colliding masses. The equation .5MaV^2 + .5MbV^2 = .5Ma'V^2 + .5Mb'V^2 + energy loss is central to solving the problem. The discussion concludes that understanding these principles is essential for accurately determining kinetic energy loss in such collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Conservation of Momentum
  • Familiarity with the Work-Energy Theorem
  • Basic knowledge of elastic collisions
  • Proficiency in algebra for deriving velocity relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Conservation of Momentum in elastic collisions
  • Learn about the Work-Energy Theorem and its applications
  • Explore detailed examples of elastic collisions involving different masses
  • Practice deriving velocity equations for two-body collisions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals involved in particle physics or mechanics who are looking to deepen their understanding of kinetic energy loss in collisions.

botab
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I need help with this problem where we are suppose to determine the fraction of kinetic energy lost by a neutron m=1.01u when it collides head-on and elastically with a target particle at rest which is.

examples used..
Hydrogen = 1.01u
heavy hydrogen = 2.01u

How would you do this?
Do we use .5MaV^2 +.5MbV^2 = .5Ma'V^2 + .5Mb'V^2 + energy loss?


examples used..
Hydrogen = 1.01u
heavy hydrogen = 2.01u

Thanks again,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello,
such questions can be solved using Conservation Of Momentum,and Work Energy theorem(that you used)

1st derive a relation between velocities of masses(call v_1\ and\ v_2)

then use the equation you are using


thanks
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
679
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
936
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K