Calculating Kinetic Energy of Rotating Bar

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the kinetic energy of a rotating bar, the bar is divided into infinitesimal segments of mass (dm) to account for varying speeds across its length. The relationship dm/dx = M/L holds true because it reflects the uniform density of the bar, which remains consistent regardless of the segment size. By integrating the kinetic energy formula K = ∫(1/2) dm v², the total kinetic energy can be derived. The linear density is calculated as 6 kg/m, confirming that this value remains constant across different segments of the bar. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the kinetic energy of the rotating bar.
delve
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin uniform 12.0-kg bar that is 2.00 m long rotates uniformly about a pivot at one end, making 5.00 complete revolutions every 3.00 seconds. What is the kinetic energy of this bar? (Hint: Different points in the bar have different speeds. Break the bar up into infinitesimal segments of mass dm and integrate to add up the kinetic energy of all these segments.


Homework Equations


K=Integral of 1/2 times dm v^2
dm=M/L *dx


The Attempt at a Solution



I got stuck when trying to substitute dm for M/L*dx. why does dm/dx=M/L if M is the mass of the entire bar and L is the length of the bar?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dm/dx = M/L
Because, each of those quantities is the density. The density is an "intensive" property of a material, it doesn't matter if I have an ocean of water or a cup of water, they are the same density. (technically density would vary with depth in an ocean due to the enormous weight, but that is beside the point)

So your dm/dx is a small portion of the rod but it should give the exact same ratio (same density) as using the entire rod does.

Try it yourself. 12kg / 2m = 6kg/m
The density is 6...
Ok, now use half the rod
6kg / 1m = 6kg/m
Or a fourth of the rod
3kg / 0.5m = 6kg/m
it will always be 6kg/m even with infinitesimal quantities like dm and dx.

[EDIT] Also keep in mind that the actual density would have to be in meters cubed, not just meters. But in this case all we are concerned with is "linear density".
 
Thank you much, that makes sense :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top