Calculating LEED Spot Angles on Si(001) Surface with 100eV Electron Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonesj314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the LEED spot angles for a 100eV electron beam incident on an unreconstructed Si(001) surface. The wavelength of the electron beam is determined using the formula λ = 12.3/√E, leading to a wave vector k. Through the Ewald sphere construction, the angle θ to the (1, 0) LEED spot is calculated as 12.76°, while the angle to the (1, 1) spot is found to be 17.76° using √2b. The poster expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations and considers whether the topic should be moved to a different forum. The inquiry highlights the need for validation of the method and results.
jonesj314
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 100eV electron beam is normally incident on an unreconstructed Si(001) surface. Calculate the angle from the surface normal to the (1, 0) and (1, 1) LEED spots (the spots are indexed using the surface unit cell)

Si cubic latice parameter is 5.43072 angstroms



Homework Equations



Can calculate the wavelength in angstroms of the electron beam using λ = \frac{12.3}{√E} where E is in eV. And hence wave vector k = \frac{2π}{λ}



The Attempt at a Solution



I have used the Ewald sphere construction to calculate the angle, θ, to the (1, 0) LEED spot in terms of the wave vector, k , and the reciprocal lattice constant, b. b = \frac{2π}{5.43072} = 1.157 k = \frac{2π}{1.23} = 5.108

Hence θ = arctan \frac{b}{k} = arctan \frac{1.157}{5.108} = 12.76°

And then to the (1, 1) spot I used √2b instead of just b in the first part to find the angle = 17.76 degrees.

I'm very uncertain of my method and the answers. Are they correct? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. Would this be better moved to a different board?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top