Calculating Light Spot Size on the Moon for a Diffraction-Limited Laser Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJLiberator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
A diffraction-limited laser beam with a diameter of 2 mm and a wavelength of 600 nm produces a light spot on the Moon approximately 72 miles wide, calculated using the small angle approximation. The angle for the width of the central maximum is derived from the formula Θ = λ/d, leading to the conclusion that the distance of 240,000 miles is relevant for determining the spot size. Some participants debated whether to consider the width of the central maximum or the distance between minima, suggesting a potential factor of 2 in the final calculation. Ultimately, both interpretations were accepted, but clarity on the definition of width is essential. The discussion highlights the complexities of calculating diffraction patterns over astronomical distances.
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


A laser is a light source that emits a diffraction-limited beam (like waves diffracting through a wide slit) of diameter 2 mm. Ignoring any scattering due to the Earth's atmosphere, calculate how big a light spot would be produced on the surface of the moon, 240,000 miles away. Assume a wavelength of approximately 600 nm.

Homework Equations


d = 2mm
L = 240,000 miles
λ = 600nm

The Attempt at a Solution



I am using a small angle approximation where Θ = λ/d from dsinΘ = λ

And so, converting the proper units, we have
Θ = (6e-7)/0.002 = 0.0003

Angle is a dimensionless unit, so this seems to be correct.

Now, if I wanted to find how big the light spot is, do I simple do
tanΘ = x/240,000 => 240,000*tan(0.0003) = x = 72 miles

Looking good?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
I am using a small angle approximation where Θ = λ/d from dsinΘ = λ
Is that the angle for the width of the central spot ?
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
Yes, I believe that is true. It is the angle for the width of the central maximum.
 
These guys think differently. Depends on how you define the width, I suppose. I had in mind this is the expression for the angle for the first minimum and was inclined to multiply by 2.
 
So, the 240,000 miles plays no part in this question then? eh?
 
Er, my answer seems to be incorrect. A laser would create a 72 mile bright spot on the moon? That doesn't seem reasonable. mmm.
 
RJLiberator said:
So, the 240,000 miles plays no part in this question then? eh?
It does play a role and you did that correctly. My hunch is they want the distance between the two minima on either side. And a 144 miles spot isn't all that big when seen from Earth (namely a viewing angle of ## \arctan 0.0006## :smile:).
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
BvU, you were absolutely correct. He accepted both answers, but he did mention the factor of 2.

Thank you for the help.
 
Back
Top