Calculating Load from Modulus of Rupture

  • Thread starter Thread starter utslam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load Modulus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the load capacity of a structure with four legs, each having specific dimensions and a Modulus of Rupture of 1100 lbs/in^2. The initial calculation suggests that each leg can support 413 lbs based on the formula provided. However, there is a debate about whether the load is distributed across multiple square inches, leading to a potential total capacity of 1,653 lbs per leg and 6,612 lbs for the entire structure. A revised formula is proposed to account for the distribution of pressure rather than a single point load. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately considering load distribution in structural calculations.
utslam
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a structure with four legs. each leg is 6" x 6" square. The bottom of each leg is 6"W x 6"L x 3/4" H. Each leg has a foot which is 4" x 4" x 4". The foot is placed in the center of the leg. The question is how much weight can the legs support before the bottom of the leg collapses.

The Modulus of Rupture of the leg bottom is 1100 lbs/in^2


Homework Equations



Modulus of Rupture = (3 x P x L)/(2 x b x d^2)

P = breaking load
L = distnace between knife edges
b = width
d = depth

The Attempt at a Solution



I rearranged the above formula to

P = M x 2 x b x d^2/ 3 x L

P = 1102 x 2 x 6 x 0.75^2/ 3 x 6 = 413 lbs.

However, I think this is assuming all of the load is applied on one square inch. Since the load is applied acrross four square inches. Does that mean each leg can support 4 x 413 lbs (1,653 lbs. So the whole sturcture can support 6,612 lbs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think the formula should be

M = 3 x P x (L-Li)/(2 x b x d^2)

since there is not a single point of pressure.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top