Calculating lost mechanical energy

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the lost mechanical energy in the collision between the two football players, first determine the total mechanical energy before the collision by adding the kinetic energies of both players. After the collision, calculate the mechanical energy of the combined mass using the velocity obtained from the previous problem. The difference between the total mechanical energy before and after the collision represents the lost mechanical energy. It's important to note that since this is an inelastic collision, some energy is indeed lost, primarily converted into other forms such as heat and sound. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
bona0002
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm trying to complete a homework problem, but I'm not quite sure how to approach it. Here is the question: A 90.5-kg fullback running east with a speed of 4.91 m/s is tackled by a 94.7-kg opponent running north with a speed of 2.93 m/s. Determine the mechanical energy that disappears as a result of the collision.

This question actually came after the question that read: Calculate the velocity of the players immediately after the tackle.

I solved that problem with the value of the magnitude being 2.83 m/s and the value of θ = 32.0°.

Now I know that in the book, they say that E_mech = K + U (kinetic energy and potential energy), but I don't quite know how to calculate the lost mechanical energy. Any pointers of how the process would go would be appreciated!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now I know that in the book, they say that E_mech = K + U (kinetic energy and potential energy), but I don't quite know how to calculate the lost mechanical energy. Any pointers of how the process would go would be appreciated!

Just calculate the mechanical energy before and after, then compare them.
 
I understand how to calculate the mechanical energy after the collision, but how do I do it before? Do I calculate the mechanical energy of the runner, of the tackler, or do I add both their mechanical energies prior to the collision, and then compare?
 
Ok, just tried it by adding the two mechanical energies prior to the collision and that gave me the correct answer. Thanks for the help!
 
bona0002 said:
Ok, just tried it by adding the two mechanical energies prior to the collision and that gave me the correct answer. Thanks for the help!


So is there any loss in the mechanical energy? I can't think of a reason for loss :S
To me it seems like both momentum and energy is conserved?
 
timarli said:
So is there any loss in the mechanical energy? I can't think of a reason for loss :S
To me it seems like both momentum and energy is conserved?
It's an inelastic collision. The two masses coalesce. Energy will certainly be lost.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top