Calculating Magnetic Field at a Point Using Biot-Savart Law

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the magnetic field at point O due to a long wire and a quarter circular arc using the Biot-Savart Law, the equation B = μ0 * I / 2a is referenced, but it may not yield the correct result if only the arc is considered. The integral form of the Biot-Savart Law should be applied, focusing on the arc's contribution while recognizing that the current and distance are constant. The relationship between the arc and the point O must be examined, particularly how the chord connecting O to the arc is perpendicular to the arc's infinitesimal length. An additional factor may be necessary in the calculations. It's also important to verify unit consistency throughout the solution process.
Eva01
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long (effectively infinite) wire segment
is connected to a quarter of a circular arc with
radius a. The other end of the arc is connected
to another long horizontal wire segment. The
current is flowing from the top coming down
vertically and flows to the right along the pos-
itive x-axis. I have included the image below.
I = 7.5A, a = 0.69 m. Find the magnetic field at O?

Homework Equations



B = μ0 * I / 2a

The Attempt at a Solution



As far as I understand since we only consider the arc part then I use the formula from above but I am not getting the right answer.

B = 4∏ * 10^-7 * 7.5 / 2*0.69 = 6.8295 N/m
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    3.1 KB · Views: 446
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Eva01,

Firstly you need to consider the origin of your equation :
B = μ0 * I / 2a

which is the Biot Savart law.

B = \frac{\mu_{0}}{4 \pi}\int \frac{(I dl \times \hat{r})}{ |\vec{r}|^{2}}

For your system you do only need to use the arc system but you should find out why..

For the arc itself, consider the law above. Clearly the I and the denominator are constant. So we need to solve

\int (dl \times \hat{r})

Remembering that a chord (r) connecting the point O to the arc will always be perpendicular to an infinitesimal length of the arc. This should give you a similar equation to what you have been using but it requires an additional factor somewhere.


I would also advise that you check your units at some point.

Hope this helps
 
Thank you for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top