Calculating Magnetic Force: Equations for Moving Charges at Right Angles

AI Thread Summary
A 3.60 mC charge moving at 862 m/s at right angles to a magnetic field experiences a magnetic force of 0.00425 N, leading to a calculated magnetic field strength of 1.37 T. For a second charge of 53.0 mC moving at 1300 m/s at a 55-degree angle to the magnetic field, the magnetic force is calculated using the corrected equation, yielding a force of 37.8 N. The discussion highlights that the equation F = qvB applies specifically for right angles, while a different approach using the cross-product is necessary for other angles. Clarification was needed regarding the angle measurement, confirming it was indeed 55 degrees. The calculations and understanding of magnetic force in relation to charge movement and angles were the main focus of the discussion.
camel-man
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
A 3.60 mC charge moving at 862 m/s travels at right angles to a magnetic field, and experiences a .00425 N magnetic force.

Find the strength of the magnetic field.

F = qvB (not sure if the right angle makes a difference in the equation.)

B= .00425 /(3.60x10^-6)(862) = 1.37 T

A 53.0 mC charge is now moving at 1300 m/s and 550 to the same magnetic field.

Find the magnetic force exerted on the second charge.

F = (53x10^-6C) (1300m/s)(550T) = 37.8 N

Does this look correct? Also, I am wondering what if the angle was not a right angle? how would that differ the equation I would use..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F = qvB is true for a right angle between motion and magnetic field only, otherwise you need the cross-product of velocity and magnetic field.

A 53.0 mC charge is now moving at 1300 m/s and 550 to the same magnetic field.
And 550 what? Is that an angle? 55°?
F = (53x10^-6C) (1300m/s)(550T) = 37.8 N
The problem statement said you should use the magnetic field from the first subquestion. And 550T is not a reasonable field strength.
 
Ahh yes I'm sorry I copy and pasted it over and didn't realize it put a zero. It is 55 degrees. yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top