Calculating Mass Increase of Earth Annually From Sunlight

a.a
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By how much does the mass of the Earth increase each year as a result of sunlight reaching it? Radiation from the sun reaches the EArth at a rate of 1400W/m^2 of area perpendicular to the energy flow. Assume 100% absorption.

Homework Equations


I'm sorry but I haven't the slightest clue as to how to approach this question.
But we are given the Radius of the Earth as 6.36 * 10 ^6 m


The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is sopposed to be 1.23 * 10^8
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll give you a hint: What is the area that is seen by the rays coming from the sun?
 
First to answer your question: only half the surface area? Which would be 2pi r^2

So we have to solve for power useing power = rate * surface area

then solve for energy useing energy = power * time

then E = mc^2 to solve for mass..

Would this mass be the increase or the mass after one year?
 
Cross sectional area. Not 1/2 of surface area. Cross section, i.e. pi*r^2. And yes, you seem to know how to calculate the rate of energy absorption and solve for the equivalent mass.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top