Calculating Masses Using Gravitational Force Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using gravitational force equations to calculate two unknown masses, M1 and M2, given their combined mass and the gravitational force between them. The initial equations lead to a quadratic equation after substituting one mass in terms of the other. Participants clarify that to find specific mass values, an assumption about the equality of M1 and M2 may be necessary, as otherwise, there are infinite combinations that satisfy the constraints. Ultimately, solving the quadratic will yield specific values for both masses. The conversation highlights the importance of algebraic manipulation and assumptions in solving such problems.
ELLE_AW
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Two celestial bodies form an isolated system in a remote region in space. When they are separated by a distance of 5000m, and they attract each other with a force of 2.67 N. If the total mass of the system is 2.5 x 10^9, then what is the mass of each celestial body?
Relevant Equations
F=Gm1m2/r^2
F=Gm1m2/r^2
2.67 = (6.67x10^-11)(m1xm2)/25000000
M1xM2 = 1 x 10^18
M2 = 1x10^18/M1 (Equation 1)

From the question stem, we know M1 + M2 = 2.5x10^9 (Equation 2)

So, substituting Equation 1 into Equation 2 we get:
1x10^18/m1 + m1 = 2.5 x 10^9

I'M STUCK FROM HERE ONWARDS... in the solutions manual they show that the m1 gets squared and you end up with a quadratic equation that you have to solve to get the two values for the masses. But, where does the squaring come in? I don't get it.

NEVERMIND, I got it! Just rusty algebra.. haha!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Either there is something missing from the problem statement or you need to make an assumption about the masses involved, such as the two being equal, if you want to arrive at a single numerical answer for the masses. Otherwise there would be an infinite number of combinations of mass values that would satisfy the given constraints.

If the solution involves m1 being squared then I strongly suspect that they expect you to assume that m1 = m2.

Can you provide any other information from the original problem statement as it was presented to you?
 
gneill said:
Either there is something missing from the problem statement or you need to make an assumption about the masses involved, such as the two being equal, if you want to arrive at a single numerical answer for the masses. Otherwise there would be an infinite number of combinations of mass values that would satisfy the given constraints.
It seems quote solvable. You have two equations and two unknowns.
$$m_1+m_2=m_{tot}$$ $$\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2}=F$$
##F##, ##m_{tot}## and ##r## are all given. So you solve the first equation for ##m_1## in terms of ##m_2## and the second equation turns into a quadratic in ##m_1##.

By inspection, the two solutions (if any) will be mirror images of one another.
 
jbriggs444 said:
By inspection, the two solutions (if any) will be mirror images of one another.
And will there be specific values for either, or will there be an expression relating the two values?
 
gneill said:
And will there be specific values for either, or will there be an expression relating the two values?
Specific values for both. Once you solve the quadratic for ##m_1##, you can easily find ##m_2##.
 
I concede your point. There are indeed a pair of mass values that either body can have that will resolve the problem. (I think I may have been dozing while I posted before. My apologies to @ELLE_AW). Cheers, jbriggs.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top