Calculating Maximum Linear Charge Density in Geiger Tube

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum linear charge density for a Geiger tube designed to detect radiation. The key point is that the breakdown of the gas occurs when the electric field reaches a specific threshold, and the radius of the wire is crucial for determining the electric field strength. The electrical field is strongest at the surface of the wire, which is why the wire's radius is used in calculations instead of the cylinder's radius. Using the cylinder's radius would result in an electric field that could lead to an unwanted discharge. Understanding this distinction is essential for ensuring the Geiger tube operates effectively without breakdown.
doubled
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For your senior project, you are designing a Geiger tube for detecting radiation in the nuclear physics laboratory. This instrument will consist of a long metal cylindrical tube that has a long straight metal wire running down its central axis. The diameter of the wire will be 0.450 mm and the inside diameter of the tube will be 4.20 cm. The tube is to be filled with a dilute gas in which an electrical discharge (breakdown of the gas) occurs when the electric field reaches 5.55 106 N/C. Determine the maximum linear charge density on the wire if breakdown of the gas is not to happen. Assume that the tube and the wire are infinitely long.


I'm not really interested in the answer, it's just the process I don't know how to do for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


actually I found out how to do it, but can someone explain to me why we use the radius of the wire instead of cylinder to get our answer? What's the point of giving the radius of the cylinder then?
 


XP I suppose I'm probably too late to be helpful now, but it's because the electrical field is strongest by the surface of the wire. If we used the radius of the cylinder, the electrical field everywhere else on the inside would be strong enough to cause an electrical discharge. The only point of it is to mislead I guess.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top