Calculating Mean Square Radius with QM Integration: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter sniffer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Qm
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mean square radius using the wavefunction \(\psi=\sum_{k} a_k exp(ikr)\), the numerator is derived by substituting \(\psi\) into the mean square radius formula. This involves expanding the square of the wavefunction and applying the product rule for integration. The integration of the exponential terms simplifies using the delta function, leading to a final expression that allows for the evaluation of integrals. Ultimately, the mean square radius simplifies to \(\rho^2=1\) under the assumption of normalization. This approach provides a clear step-by-step method for calculating the mean square radius in quantum mechanics.
sniffer
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
if i want to calculate mean square radius by using:
<br /> \rho^2=\frac{\int \mid\psi\mid^2 r^2 dr}{\int |\psi|^2 dr}<br />
with \psi=\sum_{k} a_k exp(ikr).

How do I solve the numerator part?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered integrating by parts?

Carl
 


To solve the numerator part, we first need to substitute the given wavefunction \psi into the expression for mean square radius. This gives us:

\rho^2=\frac{\int \mid\sum_{k} a_k exp(ikr)\mid^2 r^2 dr}{\int |\sum_{k} a_k exp(ikr)|^2 dr}

Next, we need to expand the square of the wavefunction using the complex conjugate. This gives us:

\rho^2=\frac{\int \sum_{k} a_k^* exp(-ikr) \sum_{k'} a_{k'} exp(ik'r) r^2 dr}{\int \sum_{k} a_k^* exp(-ikr) \sum_{k'} a_{k'} exp(ik'r) dr}

We can then simplify the numerator by using the product rule for integration and separating the terms with different values of k and k'. This gives us:

\rho^2=\frac{\sum_{k} \sum_{k'} a_k^* a_{k'} \int exp(-ikr) exp(ik'r) r^2 dr}{\sum_{k} \sum_{k'} a_k^* a_{k'} \int exp(-ikr) exp(ik'r) dr}

Now, we can use the fact that \int exp(-ikr) exp(ik'r) dr=2\pi\delta(k-k') to simplify the expression further. This yields:

\rho^2=\frac{\sum_{k} a_k^* a_k \int r^2 dr}{\sum_{k} a_k^* a_k \int dr}

Finally, we can solve the integrals in the numerator and denominator to get:

\rho^2=\frac{\sum_{k} a_k^* a_k \frac{r^3}{3}\Bigg|_0^\infty}{\sum_{k} a_k^* a_k r\Bigg|_0^\infty}

Since the wavefunction is expected to be normalized, i.e. \int |\psi|^2 dr=1, we can simplify the expression further to get:

\rho^2=\frac{\sum_{k} a_k^* a_k}{\sum_{k} a_k^* a_k}=1

Therefore, the mean square radius for the given wave
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top