Calculating Expected Values for 3D Harmonic Oscillator Wave Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating expected values related to the wave function of a three-dimensional harmonic oscillator. The original poster presents a wave function and seeks to determine the most probable value of the distance from the origin, as well as the expected values of the distance and its reciprocal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the most probable value of ##r## by maximizing the wave function, but encounters a discrepancy with the expected answer. They also calculate the expected values using integration but question their results.
  • Some participants suggest reconsidering the integration in spherical coordinates and emphasize the importance of the volume element in probability calculations.
  • There is a discussion about maximizing the probability distribution and the implications of integrating over a volume versus a point.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations and approaches. Some have provided guidance on integrating in spherical coordinates and the significance of the volume element, while others are still questioning the original poster's understanding of the most probable value.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working within the constraints of a homework assignment and is navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics at an introductory level, which may influence their approach and understanding of the problem.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47

Homework Statement


The wave function for the three dimensional oscillator can be written
##\Psi(\mathbf r) = Ce^{-\frac{1}{2}(r/r_0)^2}##
where ##C## and ##r_0## are constants and ##r## the distance from the origen.
Calculate
a) The most probably value for ##r##
b) The expected value of ##r##
c) The expected value of ##1/r##.

Homework Equations


Expected value of function with a normed wave function
##<f(r)> = \int dr \Psi(r)^*f(r) \Psi ##.

The Attempt at a Solution


a) It is my understanding that the most probably value is the maximum value of ##\Psi^* \Psi## or equivalently in this case the maximum of ##\Psi## which is at ##r=0##.
The answer to the exercise however disagrees and says it's at ##r_0##.
If the oscillator is centered at ##r_0## this makes physical sense with the most probably value of course being the centre but it doesn't seem to agree with maximizing the function.

b) Norming the wave function
##1 = C^2 \int_0^\infty e^{-r^2/r_0^2}dr = C^2 \int_0^\infty r_0 e^{-s^2}ds = C^2\frac{r_0 \sqrt{\pi}}{2}## and hence that ##C^2 = \frac{2}{r_0 \sqrt{\pi}}##.
The expected value of ##r## is then
##<r> = \frac{2}{r_0\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^\infty re^{-r^2/r_0^2} dr = \frac{r_0}{\sqrt{\pi}}##.
The answer however says ##\frac{2r_0}{\sqrt{\pi}}##.

c) For this one, I get a divergent integral ##<1/r> = \frac{2}{r_0\sqrt{\pi}} \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{-r^2/r_0^2}}{r} dr##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're very modest to post QM under "introductory" homework. In any case, your problems stem from not thinking enough about integrating in spherical coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Well it's a first course in QM for second year university students (at an European university) so I felt it being more introductory. The advanced forum I thought were mainly for graduate students.

Thanks! I forgot I have to integrate over the volume in this case.
Norming the function
##1 = C^2 \int_0^\infty \int_0^\pi \int_0^{2\pi} r^2\sin \theta e^{-r^2/r_0^2}d\phi d\theta dr = C^2 4\pi \frac{\sqrt{\pi}r_0^3}{4} = C^2 \pi \sqrt{\pi} r_0^3 \Longrightarrow C^2 = \frac{1}{\pi \sqrt{\pi }r_0^3}##.

The expected value is then
##<r> = \frac{1}{\pi \sqrt{\pi} r_0^3} 4\pi \int_0^\infty r^3e^{-r^2/r_0^2}dr = \frac{1}{\pi \sqrt{\pi} r_0^3} 4\pi \frac{r_0^4}{2} = \frac{2r_0}{\sqrt{\pi}}## as expected!

And for ##1/r##
##<1/r> = \frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi} r_0^3} \int_0^\infty re^{-r^2/r_0^2}dr = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi} r_0}##.

However as for the a) question I'm still not sure? that doesn't have anything with integrating to do.
 
Incand said:
However as for the a) question I'm still not sure? that doesn't have anything with integrating to do.

Why not calculate the probability that the particle is found near a given distance from the origin: between ##R## and ##R+ \epsilon## say?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
After thinking about this for a while it seems my error here just as before is that I need the volume element.

As far as I understand it, the probability distribution is
##P(\mathbf r) = |\Psi(\mathbf r)|^2 = \Psi^*(\mathbf r) \Psi(\mathbf r).##
And the probability of finding the particle within a certain volume is
##\int_V P(\mathbf r) dV##.
In our case that is
##I = \frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}r_0^3} \int_R^{R+\epsilon} r^2e^{-r^2/r_0^2}dr##
So we want to find the ##R## that maximizes ##\int_R^{R+\epsilon} r^2e^{-r^2/r_0^2}dr## when ##\epsilon \to 0##.
However since this seem complicated we can instead maximize the integrand ##r^2e^{-r^2/r_0^2}## which has a maximum for ##r=r_0##.
So I need to account for the scale factors when I'm not working in Cartesian coordinates. Thanks for helping!
 
Incand said:
After thinking about this for a while it seems my error here just as before is that I need the volume element.

As far as I understand it, the probability distribution is
##P(\mathbf r) = |\Psi(\mathbf r)|^2 = \Psi^*(\mathbf r) \Psi(\mathbf r).##
And the probability of finding the particle within a certain volume is
##\int_V P(\mathbf r) dV##.
In our case that is
##I = \frac{4}{\sqrt{\pi}r_0^3} \int_R^{R+\epsilon} r^2e^{-r^2/r_0^2}dr##
So we want to find the ##R## that maximizes ##\int_R^{R+\epsilon} r^2e^{-r^2/r_0^2}dr## when ##\epsilon \to 0##.
However since this seem complicated we can instead maximize the integrand ##r^2e^{-r^2/r_0^2}## which has a maximum for ##r=r_0##.
So I need to account for the scale factors when I'm not working in Cartesian coordinates. Thanks for helping!

Yes. The thing you're missing is that the limit of an integral such as the one you have is simply the function value at the point:

##\lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int_{R}^{R+\epsilon} f(r) dr = f(R)##

So, maximising that integral is equivalent to maximising ##f##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Thanks for pointing that out. I had forgotten about the mean value theorem!
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K