Calculating Minimum Deceleration and Meeting Heights in Kinematics

~SPaRtaN~
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(1) A speed trap is set up with two pressure activated strips placed across a highway, 116 meters apart. A car is speeding along at 29.6 meters per second, while the speed limit is only 19.4 meters per second. At the instant the car activates the first strip, the driver begins slowing down. What minimum deceleration (magnitude only) is needed so that the driver's average speed is within the limit by the time the car crosses the second strip?

(2)Suppose you throw a stone straight up with an initial velocity of 29.5 m/s and, 4.5 s later you throw a second stone straight up with the same initial velocity. The first stone going down will meet the second stone going up. At what height above the point of release do the two stones meet

Homework Equations



v(final) = v(initial) + at
x(final) = x(initial) + v(initial)*t + 1/2 at^2
x(final) - x(initial) = 1/2 [v(final) - v(initial)]*t
2a[x(final) - x(initial)] = v(final)^2 - v(initial)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Couldn't get the right answer, tried 2 times
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might begin with these two equations:

d = \frac{1}{2} a t2

where a and t are unknown, and

vavg = \frac{vfinal + vinitial}{2}

where vfinal is unknown but can be written in terms of vinitial, a and t.
 
^ i tried but lost somewhere...its too confusing for me
 
anybody to help on these problems...just 1 day left
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top